| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<67f47ca5$1@news.ausics.net> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
From: noel <deletethis@invalid.lan> Subject: inn, cleanfeed and ipv6 Newsgroups: news.software.nntp User-Agent: Pan/0.141 (Tarzan's Death; 168b179 git.gnome.org/pan2) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit NNTP-Posting-Host: news.ausics.net Message-ID: <67f47ca5$1@news.ausics.net> Date: 8 Apr 2025 11:32:21 +1000 Organization: Ausics - https://newsgroups.ausics.net Lines: 24 X-Complaints: abuse@ausics.net Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.bbs.nz!news.ausics.net!not-for-mail Bytes: 1985 I've had a few reports of select users posts not getting out to all servers, and experienced it myself in a group last night, running one of my scripts that checks open servers, verified my suspicions, there seems to be something in the cleanfead script inn servers not liking (all?) ipv6 addresses. I resent my message 3 times, and inn servers declined the takethis every time, I removed only the ipv6 address in it, and the message was taken by the peers who operate inn, I asked 2 of who complained about this I know are not dummies to try it, same exact message, resend, wait an hour then resend removing only ipv6 address, they reported back to me this morning there ipv6-less messages can be seen on the inn based servers. all the ipv6 addresses -mine and the examples they sent me, were all different, nowhere near each other entirely. Now I know I've seen some in the past, I've sent some in the past that have propogated, perhaps its not all address es that trigger this. I know I was shown inns cleanfeed few years back and its totally different from dnews's cleanfeed which dnews has had internally since day dot, I'm suspecting since the peers who accepted it, do binaries, it might be in the detection of such messages, and is misclassifying ipv6 addresses - but as not an inn operator, I'm only guessing.