Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<67facf19$0$12914$426a74cc@news.free.fr> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!news.roellig-ltd.de!open-news-network.org!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!news.mixmin.net!proxad.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!cleanfeed2-b.proxad.net!nnrp4-1.free.fr!not-for-mail Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity Subject: Re: Why does the universe go to all the bother of existing? From: nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) Reply-To: jjlxa31@xs4all.nl (J. J. Lodder) Date: Sat, 12 Apr 2025 22:37:45 +0200 References: <67EF682D.135A@ix.netcom.com> <67F01AE8.5A1A@ix.netcom.com> <67F04BF8.F9C@ix.netcom.com> <67F173B4.DC@ix.netcom.com> <e196baed039a0b3096885dd026bc319a@www.novabbs.com> <1rakhfg.vqrsfd2xnf4mN%nospam@de-ster.demon.nl> <8309cf9411b3d1fb6990a61dbcac02b9@www.novabbs.com> <vt8eja$2vhnd$2@dont-email.me> <m5rn1nFj157U5@mid.individual.net> <1ramdrp.6j8jyps41hq0N%nospam@de-ster.demon.nl> <vtblj2$28dbm$1@dont-email.me> <m5unm2F36ttU6@mid.individual.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Organization: De Ster Mail-Copies-To: nobody User-Agent: MacSOUP/2.8.5 (ea919cf118) (Mac OS 10.12.6) Lines: 30 Message-ID: <67facf19$0$12914$426a74cc@news.free.fr> NNTP-Posting-Date: 12 Apr 2025 22:37:45 CEST NNTP-Posting-Host: 213.10.137.58 X-Trace: 1744490265 news-3.free.fr 12914 213.10.137.58:54654 X-Complaints-To: abuse@proxad.net Bytes: 2340 Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> wrote: > Am Freitag000011, 11.04.2025 um 20:04 schrieb Douglas Laterza: > > J. J. Lodder wrote: > > > >> Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> wrote: > >>> But particles, atoms, rays and many other physical objects are not > >>> called 'K�rper'. > > > > of course not, since are particles and waves, and not koerpers. > > > >>> The title 'electrodynamics of moving bodies' had therefore a strange > >>> connotation in German. > >> > >> So you are incompetent in scientific German as well. > > Well, actually I'm not a physicist and don't know, how the physicists talk. Yet you pretend to understand physics. > I'm an engineer from education and had no personal contacts to the > physics department. So: possibly they speak in a different idiom than > engineers do. > > To me the title 'moving bodies' (combined with 'electric forces') sounds > like a synonym for 'sex'. Yes, complete incompetence, Jan