Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!news.nk.ca!rocksolid2!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: joes <noreply@example.org>
Newsgroups: comp.theory
Subject: Re: The philosophy of computation reformulates existing ideas on a
 new basis
Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2024 08:37:03 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: i2pn2 (i2pn.org)
Message-ID: <685c833bcfa51d3531138833a24c440109a8d926@i2pn2.org>
References: <vfli1h$fj8s$1@dont-email.me>
	<086fc32f14bcc004466d3128b0fe585b27377399@i2pn2.org>
	<vfqsui$1jg6i$2@dont-email.me> <vft4om$44tc$2@i2pn2.org>
	<vft944$25aio$6@dont-email.me>
	<11408789ed30027f4bc9a743f353dfa9b4712109@i2pn2.org>
	<QU2dnTAfup30Rr_6nZ2dnZfqn_WdnZ2d@brightview.co.uk>
	<vfvnml$2ll12$1@dont-email.me> <vfvujg$2mcse$6@dont-email.me>
	<vg2cqm$37cq6$1@dont-email.me> <vg2kfq$38m0h$1@dont-email.me>
	<vg4va2$3ok87$1@dont-email.me> <vg55lv$3pnvp$1@dont-email.me>
	<vg7sdl$cbfk$1@dont-email.me> <vg83vt$dri5$1@dont-email.me>
	<vgcmu4$1eurt$1@dont-email.me> <vgd5vl$1hqli$1@dont-email.me>
	<vgfv31$25h28$1@dont-email.me> <vgg1qh$26126$1@dont-email.me>
	<vgi2t6$2js8i$1@dont-email.me> <vgiqgt$2nkqv$2@dont-email.me>
	<vgl0pf$37081$1@dont-email.me> <vgl7qo$37h38$3@dont-email.me>
	<vgnbfc$3uefk$1@paganini.bofh.team> <vgnt6e$3qq7s$4@dont-email.me>
	<vgsog6$uu8r$1@dont-email.me> <vgt71t$11e5a$4@dont-email.me>
	<vgvdp1$1iie3$1@dont-email.me> <vh0lpm$1qfts$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2024 08:37:03 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: i2pn2.org;
	logging-data="2239262"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org";
	posting-account="nS1KMHaUuWOnF/ukOJzx6Ssd8y16q9UPs1GZ+I3D0CM";
User-Agent: Pan/0.145 (Duplicitous mercenary valetism; d7e168a
 git.gnome.org/pan2)
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0
Bytes: 2764
Lines: 18

Am Tue, 12 Nov 2024 16:45:10 -0600 schrieb olcott:
> On 11/12/2024 5:22 AM, Mikko wrote:
>> On 2024-11-11 15:15:09 +0000, olcott said:
>>> On 11/11/2024 5:06 AM, Mikko wrote:
>>>> On 2024-11-09 14:56:14 +0000, olcott said:
>>>>> On 11/9/2024 3:53 AM, Mikko wrote:

>> THere is similar ambiguity in x86 semantics as there are operation
>> codes that are defined on some x86 processor models but undefined on
>> others, and it is also undefined what happens on a jump to a address in
>> a non-exstent or uninitialised memory.
> Anyone with sufficient understanding of the x86 language fully well
> knows that no DDD emulated by any HHH can possibly reach past its own
> [0000217a] machine address.
Only if the called HHH doesn’t halt. Why doesn’t it?

-- 
Am Sat, 20 Jul 2024 12:35:31 +0000 schrieb WM in sci.math:
It is not guaranteed that n+1 exists for every n.