Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!i2pn.org!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: hitlong@yahoo.com (gharnagel)
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Subject: Re: A short proof of the inconsistency of The Shit
Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2024 02:56:04 +0000
Organization: novaBBS
Message-ID: <6924ff328199394116710ac198f103e2@www.novabbs.com>
References: <17ee15afea6b29a3$410850$558427$c2065a8b@news.newsdemon.com> <98212c666b602cbacf2476fc4341c29a@www.novabbs.com> <17ee5fade60d851b$504666$505064$c2265aab@news.newsdemon.com> <b50bb10aa2dd5727a1bf8ff9bf88a049@www.novabbs.com> <17ee716d7c7bfd12$441950$558427$c2065a8b@news.newsdemon.com> <5ac85e6c9332ca0bece0023f17f2f442@www.novabbs.com> <17ee8ec58ffd13c8$485658$546728$c2565adb@news.newsdemon.com> <c519bd5f0f4086da711ede104860ed8e@www.novabbs.com> <17eeb977c7724ff7$459327$558427$c2065a8b@news.newsdemon.com> <694f454547a8e56961b6896086a119f8@www.novabbs.com> <17eede9524f9dfa3$533525$505064$c2265aab@news.newsdemon.com> <916be12c0817f8d3d361d8265d8c57d5@www.novabbs.com> <17eefed3289d061e$484574$558427$c2065a8b@news.newsdemon.com> <9da205dae3661a1709fed8ec149b04d3@www.novabbs.com> <17ef02dd9f274dac$613242$505029$c2365abb@news.newsdemon.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Info: i2pn2.org;
	logging-data="3915400"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org";
	posting-account="p+/k+WRPC4XqxRx3JUZcWF5fRnK/u/hzv6aL21GRPZM";
User-Agent: Rocksolid Light
X-Rslight-Posting-User: 47dad9ee83da8658a9a980eb24d2d25075d9b155
X-Rslight-Site: $2y$10$6KHw6BhcTbVe6ohzrxeFbOgxX8.2sv8jZ5akIx9E3hKeNpPCk48ri
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0
Bytes: 3143
Lines: 42

On Sun, 25 Aug 2024 15:38:53 +0000, Maciej Wozniak wrote:
>
> W dniu 25.08.2024 o 17:21, gharnagel pisze:
> >

> Not quite. The older ones are also mentioned
> there.

But not asked about.  Irrelevant, anyway.

> So, the physics of your idiot guru had no definition
> of second? Will you be impudent enough for such
> an absurd lie, trash?

Theoretical physicists don't define seconds.  If Wozniak
believes Saint Albert defined the second, he is free to
prove it.  Otherwise, my claim stands.

> > Wozniak is lying again and studiously ignoring the peanut
> > butter barf all over himself.
> >
> > He is assuming that Newtonian physics with its universal
> > time is true,
>
> I'm not assuming anything right now,

That is a falsehood.  Just because he assumes it implicitly
doesn't mean that he doesn't assume it.

> I apply the inconsistent assumptions of the physics
> of your idiot guru and derive 2 denying
> themself predictions. I can do it, because
> the mumble of your idiot guru was not even
> consistent.

Wozniak is daydreaming.  He has assumed his conclusion
based on Newtonian time assumption, which has been refuted
by copious experimental evidence.  He is simply in denial
of reality.

“To hate being wrong is to change your opinion when you are
proven wrong; whereas pride, even when proven wrong, decides
to go on being wrong.” ― Criss Jami