Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!i2pn.org!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: hitlong@yahoo.com (gharnagel)
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Subject: Re: [SR] =?UTF-8?B?V2h5PyA=?=
Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2024 22:03:49 +0000
Organization: novaBBS
Message-ID: <6bba68b5b45c50bfb204d0a6b94c3783@www.novabbs.com>
References: <LD4K6BjN8LU7EyULcWktoQOIq38@jntp> <a9ce6a08d87164cd99e9d1b296a2fcfe@www.novabbs.com> <RPvLJWuw8z32lAq2KSr5n_u6nII@jntp>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Info: i2pn2.org;
	logging-data="537171"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org";
	posting-account="2U0RwOYzNU+ijpgbVXd5Zmcos0AIe32+I2dWAQYE4iw";
User-Agent: Rocksolid Light
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0
X-Rslight-Site: $2y$10$cJoumYEbE.wNUT1IAfZMaeCu.w/BIt5sKBGNW2GS7nqis1cHlBcMq
X-Rslight-Posting-User: 47dad9ee83da8658a9a980eb24d2d25075d9b155
Bytes: 2237
Lines: 44

Richard Hachel wrote:

> Le 19/06/2024 à 20:55, hitlong@yahoo.com (gharnagel) a écrit :
> > Richard Hachel wrote:
> > >
> > > One of the fundamental equations of the theory of relativity, 
> > > To²=Tr²+Et², probably even one of the most beautiful in all of
> science,
> > > 
> >> will however pose a small problem for a few months to the greatest 
> > > theorist of our time: the doctor Richard Hachel.
> > 
> > Hachel failed to define his terms, so that's neither fundamental nor
> > beautiful.
> > 
> > > A problem will appear to emerge in the development of uniformly 
> > > accelerated frames of reference, because if we set
> x=(1/2.a.Tr²+Vr.Tr)
> > > it no longer works.
> > 
> > If the first equation is relativistic, the second surely is not.
>
> It is.

Nope.  You still haven't defined your terms.  Therefore, your thesis is
void.

> Je n'ai pas écrit:
> x=(1/2)a.To²+Vo.To
>
> but:
>  x=(1/2).a.Tr²+Vr.Tr
>
> Cette dernière équation est relativiste.

Nope.

> Mais j'ai précisé qu'elle était relativiste, mais fausse.
>
> Et j'ai demandé si on comprenait pourquoi?
>
> R.H. 

I understand that you are full of baloney since you refuse to
define what To, Vo, Tr, Vr and a mean.