Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!i2pn.org!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org>
Newsgroups: comp.theory,sci.logic
Subject: Re: 197 page execution trace of DDD correctly simulated by HHH ---
 Richard proves that he is clueless
Date: Tue, 2 Jul 2024 22:46:33 -0400
Organization: i2pn2 (i2pn.org)
Message-ID: <6c12c412fecfad2eec6f3c3776de9aa9785ad374@i2pn2.org>
References: <v4vrfg$2793f$1@dont-email.me> <v5u97g$12udb$6@dont-email.me>
 <v5vi62$1oanb$3@i2pn2.org> <v5vljj$1b0k9$3@dont-email.me>
 <v5vocu$1oanb$10@i2pn2.org> <v5vp03$1fbi8$1@dont-email.me>
 <v5vpht$1oana$8@i2pn2.org> <v5vrac$1fg22$2@dont-email.me>
 <v5vrnq$1oana$10@i2pn2.org> <v5vsff$1fqfa$2@dont-email.me>
 <e9c681b90a30f1c1c0b14c970675c5d6b104f535@i2pn2.org>
 <v60se2$1kr1q$5@dont-email.me>
 <04db95a103cfbcb76bd6082752ed89932cfce5d5@i2pn2.org>
 <v620nf$1qutj$1@dont-email.me>
 <adab42d299905f4219330596cccb5184f5e09597@i2pn2.org>
 <v621b9$1qutj$3@dont-email.me>
 <95b8d2686a17a5fee6b5811ca115c902fbc7b17a@i2pn2.org>
 <v629fd$1s632$2@dont-email.me>
 <c6747d2097a1946c7ebbe140882831375219deea@i2pn2.org>
 <v62aa6$1s632$4@dont-email.me>
 <5b7927d3326970682c6165aa8d2b4bccee65df37@i2pn2.org>
 <v62b0t$1s632$5@dont-email.me>
 <f0b106f793e07d23ba6ac455dc795552de5a6d73@i2pn2.org>
 <v62bth$1s632$7@dont-email.me>
 <a6c36193b3d7181f8e63fc3b53aee6b7da47d792@i2pn2.org>
 <v62de5$20moo$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Wed, 3 Jul 2024 02:46:34 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: i2pn2.org;
	logging-data="1962626"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org";
	posting-account="diqKR1lalukngNWEqoq9/uFtbkm5U+w3w6FQ0yesrXg";
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
In-Reply-To: <v62de5$20moo$1@dont-email.me>
Content-Language: en-US
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0
Bytes: 3782
Lines: 48

On 7/2/24 10:35 PM, olcott wrote:
> On 7/2/2024 9:23 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
>> On 7/2/24 10:09 PM, olcott wrote:
>>> On 7/2/2024 8:59 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
>>>> On 7/2/24 9:54 PM, olcott wrote:
>>>>> On 7/2/2024 8:48 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
>>>>>> On 7/2/24 9:42 PM, olcott wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The Tarski proof directly provides the detailed inference steps.
>>>>>>> So it is not that I do under understand the Gödel proof it is that
>>>>>>> this proof is opaque completely hiding all of the important details.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> No, you miss the fact that you are starting in the MIDDLE of an 
>>>>>> arguement, and that what you are thinking as a assumption is a 
>>>>>> proven statement (which you don't understand)
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> You can't correct my error because you know that you have no 
>>>>> understanding of the Tarski proof. It is the same tactic as
>>>>> always dishonestly deflect rather than make any attempt to
>>>>> correct to hide the fact that you are clueless.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Nope, I WON'T correct your error, because you have proved yourself 
>>>> to be a LIAR.
>>>>
>>> You just proved that you are clueless.
>>
>> Why, becasue I won't help a proven liar?
>>
>> You have proven that you do not have the necessary background to 
>> understand it, and even if you did you would just LIE about what it 
>> says, just like you always do.
>>
> 
> Dishonest dodge. I just looked up my rebuttal again.
> 

So? You still haven't shown you understand what was actually being said.

YOU are not a good judge of truth, you have proven it, as you have 
proven yourself to be just a dishonest liar.

Or, are you going to show the nonsense proof that you believe shows 
Godel wrong?


You logic is just so full of holes, it could be used as swiss cheese.