Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<6c56b6df33cedd35cac468735501d2d89ad19048@i2pn2.org> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!i2pn.org!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: joes <noreply@example.org> Newsgroups: sci.math Subject: Re: How many different unit fractions are lessorequal than all unit fractions? (infinitary) Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2024 12:41:51 -0000 (UTC) Organization: i2pn2 (i2pn.org) Message-ID: <6c56b6df33cedd35cac468735501d2d89ad19048@i2pn2.org> References: <vb4rde$22fb4$2@solani.org> <68b8be64-7fe8-47e7-a991-7adf14713af5@att.net> <vejmkm$e069$1@solani.org> <eb21591a-a60a-4baf-bdbd-afef2a69c230@att.net> <vejte9$e3ds$1@solani.org> <53460f91-4542-4a92-bc4b-833c2ad61e52@att.net> <ventec$255vi$2@dont-email.me> <venunr$2533b$4@dont-email.me> <29ce40e9-f18a-44d4-84d9-23e587cf9dea@att.net> <veor6u$2asus$1@dont-email.me> <2b6f9104-a927-49ee-9cf0-6ee3f82edc23@att.net> <verkkk$2r6kk$1@dont-email.me> <22f95ff7-c361-4d8a-943c-1df76abb98cc@att.net> <vevpsl$3pi3s$2@dont-email.me> <ed1862ff-3679-4175-bb25-c317be9713b2@att.net> <vf0t7i$3v3cv$5@dont-email.me> <9c55eda1-bb24-44ae-9158-2a3b354170cd@att.net> <vf2ck9$amc3$1@dont-email.me> <4ce512c0-8196-4923-9a6b-359c25fdfa3a@att.net> <vf3ldc$hgts$2@dont-email.me> <8418a2e3-bba2-43b4-8c77-3e947a270476@att.net> <vf3n5v$i1ai$2@dont-email.me> <vf3r29$ipdp$1@dont-email.me> <vf52gf$sc1t$2@dont-email.me> <d854b742bc974c19b0106fa51222bbb640e2d92d@i2pn2.org> <b2090fd4-8329-4c3c-9698-a1e7697040b1@tha.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2024 12:41:51 -0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: i2pn2.org; logging-data="2999698"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org"; posting-account="nS1KMHaUuWOnF/ukOJzx6Ssd8y16q9UPs1GZ+I3D0CM"; User-Agent: Pan/0.145 (Duplicitous mercenary valetism; d7e168a git.gnome.org/pan2) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0 Bytes: 2469 Lines: 13 Am Mon, 21 Oct 2024 11:59:00 +0200 schrieb WM: > On 21.10.2024 10:21, joes wrote: >> Am Mon, 21 Oct 2024 10:14:07 +0200 schrieb WM: > >>> If the range was complete, the image shows that the range was not >>> complete. >> If the range really is complete, it needs to be infinite, so it can >> include the larger numbers. > No. No set of numbers can include larger numbers. Dude. An infinite set can contain an m>n for every n in it. -- Am Sat, 20 Jul 2024 12:35:31 +0000 schrieb WM in sci.math: It is not guaranteed that n+1 exists for every n.