Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!news.nk.ca!rocksolid2!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org>
Newsgroups: comp.theory
Subject: Re: HHH(DDD) computes the mapping from its input to HHH emulating
 itself emulating DDD
Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2024 20:45:48 -0500
Organization: i2pn2 (i2pn.org)
Message-ID: <6d0683c816f5f63b3a17c8a52e9b691eecc143a8@i2pn2.org>
References: <vhdd32$oq0l$1@dont-email.me>
 <GcudnQRbD7HyPNv6nZ2dnZfqlJ-dnZ2d@giganews.com> <vi72fe$dbk$1@dont-email.me>
 <vi76pj$106j$2@dont-email.me>
 <db87472521a4e553e992c6933a235dec24fb002f@i2pn2.org>
 <vi8g7t$85ij$1@dont-email.me>
 <ee397fde844b6e8f2266885eb1b657ad4da768f8@i2pn2.org>
 <via50f$ju6v$1@dont-email.me>
 <349430b1223591beb2ebea42b5f3a9e64ea8d795@i2pn2.org>
 <via6qe$ju6v$5@dont-email.me>
 <f4f759fcc2f0b701a91e38062c25d16534e470af@i2pn2.org>
 <via804$kfnn$1@dont-email.me>
 <39d1fae0d0e03ceb82a6a7c722581d5e84d4998f@i2pn2.org>
 <via9kk$kpf2$1@dont-email.me>
 <6f73ca664f7017ea34651a485a4bd3602e9cbe57@i2pn2.org>
 <vilrih$3n2q7$2@dont-email.me>
 <b961b7e79a85fcb3bbd058930fef41e582f7acdd@i2pn2.org>
 <vio31i$dg23$1@dont-email.me>
 <4ccc2cbecfd0e6befd031ed394f1262edd021822@i2pn2.org>
 <viposd$u16a$1@dont-email.me>
 <dd3385b7f379281e5d476701f96e30538ea85802@i2pn2.org>
 <viqua6$16uvh$1@dont-email.me>
 <3d80e95768bf6260168865530aaad3591aa03fda@i2pn2.org>
 <vir0c7$17d36$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Thu, 5 Dec 2024 01:45:48 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: i2pn2.org;
	logging-data="1321043"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org";
	posting-account="diqKR1lalukngNWEqoq9/uFtbkm5U+w3w6FQ0yesrXg";
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0
In-Reply-To: <vir0c7$17d36$1@dont-email.me>
Content-Language: en-US
Bytes: 4084
Lines: 61

On 12/4/24 8:41 PM, olcott wrote:
> On 12/4/2024 7:31 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
>> On 12/4/24 8:06 PM, olcott wrote:
>>> On 12/4/2024 6:11 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
>>>> On 12/4/24 9:27 AM, olcott wrote:
>>>>> On 12/3/2024 5:39 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
>>>>>> On 12/3/24 6:08 PM, olcott wrote:
>>>>>>> On 12/3/2024 3:03 AM, joes wrote:
>>>>>>>> Am Mon, 02 Dec 2024 20:48:49 -0600 schrieb olcott:
>>>>>>>>> On 11/28/2024 1:48 PM, joes wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> You said:
>>>>>>>>>   >>> HHH can't simulate itself.
>>>>>>>>> That is WRONG !!!
>>>>>>>>> HHH DOES EMULATE ITSELF PROVING THAT IT CAN EMULATE ITSELF.
>>>>>>>> We know that HHH halts. It doesn't simulate itself halting.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Please try and explain how you are not dishonest what you
>>>>>>> try to change the subject from my rebuttal of your statement:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>  >>> HHH can't simulate itself.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> That HHH does emulate itself emulating DDD proves
>>>>>>> THAT IT CAN DO THIS.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> But only if your think that wrong answer can be right.
>>>>>
>>>>> I did not mention anything about answers my entire
>>>>> scope is that HHH does emulate itself emulating DDD
>>>>> thus conclusively proving that HHH can emulated itself
>>>>> emulating DDD.
>>>>>
>>>>> Whenever you go out-of-scope like this it surely
>>>>> seems dishonest to me.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> But the behaivor that HHH shows that it has *IS* an "answer",
>>>
>>> DDD emulated by any HHH according to the semantics of
>>> the x86 language cannot possibly reach its "ret" instruction
>>> whether HHH aborts this emulation after N steps or never aborts.
>>>
>>>
>>
>> Just a nonsense sentence, since HHH can't emulate HHH as it isn't 
>> given it, 
> 
> Why do you have to keep fucking lying about this?
> I could die on the operating table in two weeks!
> 

What's the lie?

Can you point to what I say that is wrong, and a reliable reference that 
show it?

All you have is your own lies to call it a lie.

And yes, you might die in two weeks, and the only thing you will have 
left behind is all your lies.