Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!news.nk.ca!rocksolid2!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: hitlong@yahoo.com (gharnagel)
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Subject: Re: Incorrect mathematical integration
Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2024 20:17:19 +0000
Organization: novaBBS
Message-ID: <6d1fd7e074125e549ea60023a3381fa0@www.novabbs.com>
References: <EKV4LWfwyF4mvRIpW8X1iiirzQk@jntp> <v7h59v$3mabh$1@dont-email.me> <UqTpLIJxvD4VcXT01kWm7g9OGtU@jntp> <v7jnc7$7jpq$1@dont-email.me> <mfV6MMujytR2UhBNkDwxHq9D0Ho@jntp> <v7mcdd$pmhs$2@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Info: i2pn2.org;
	logging-data="9094"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org";
	posting-account="p+/k+WRPC4XqxRx3JUZcWF5fRnK/u/hzv6aL21GRPZM";
User-Agent: Rocksolid Light
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0
X-Rslight-Posting-User: 47dad9ee83da8658a9a980eb24d2d25075d9b155
X-Rslight-Site: $2y$10$3RGb4ENULSujRkt6oV7we.Pg20.5XjAowEq0sVj4ff5cy.I5pZRxy
Bytes: 1933
Lines: 19

On Mon, 22 Jul 2024 19:37:17 +0000, Paul.B.Andersen wrote:
>
> Den 21.07.2024 22:34, skrev Richard Hachel:
> >
> > In the best case of my synchronization, each watch will delay the
> other
> > by t=x/c unavoidable, universal, physical delay.

"Dr. H." is confusing the issue by bringing up the time delay of a
remote
clock.  In SR, one has observers at every location who records the time
shown on the local clock when a local event occurs.  All the records are
then compared, so speed-of-light time delay is NOT an issue.

> It is obviously impossible to make two clocks side by side show
> the same with infinite precision, there will always be a difference.
> For atomic clocks this difference may be less than 1 ns,
> for say - wristwatches it will be less than 1 second.

Which is why "absolute" synchronization is a canard.