| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<6efc4fec918d6d2bc29250159bafb5de@www.novabbs.com> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!i2pn.org!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: melahi_ahmed@yahoo.fr (ahmed)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.forth
Subject: Re: Back & Forth - Co-routines
Date: Sat, 1 Feb 2025 08:22:01 +0000
Organization: novaBBS
Message-ID: <6efc4fec918d6d2bc29250159bafb5de@www.novabbs.com>
References: <nnd$2fb29a8e$298ef3f8@23fe4f00fa62d734> <9c16141dfe3c785e316678770e965566@www.novabbs.com> <87plk2y6yf.fsf@nightsong.com> <2025Feb1.082611@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Info: i2pn2.org;
logging-data="2146944"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org";
posting-account="t+/9LUKLIiUqIe6reyFE7me/EcA/Gr17dRXgwnADesE";
User-Agent: Rocksolid Light
X-Rslight-Site: $2y$10$J8v.KajuUeJsRA60CrXhhes0rVp1Fco5tRgnILWu0mb1pezlyVRKK
X-Rslight-Posting-User: 5f6b2e70af503e44dad56966aa15d35bdef29623
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0
Bytes: 3271
Lines: 88
On Sat, 1 Feb 2025 7:26:11 +0000, Anton Ertl wrote:
> Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> writes:
>>This seems more in the locals spirit:
>>
>>: blend { a x b -- n } 100 b x - b a - */ ;
>>: tri_mf3.1 { x a b c -- mf }
>> a x <= x b < AND IF b x a blend EXIT THEN
>> b x <= x c < AND IF b x c blend EXIT THEN
>> 0 ;
>
> Forth has a word WITHIN that should come in handy here:
>
> : tri_mf3.1 { x a b c -- mf }
> x a b within IF b x a blend EXIT THEN
> x b c within IF b x c blend EXIT THEN
> 0 ;
Yes, it works fine. Thanks.
> Another alternative, assuming a<=b<=c:
>
> : tri_mf3.1 { x a b c -- mf }
> case
> x a < ?of 0 endof
> x b < ?of b x a blend endof
> x c < ?of b x c blend endof
> 0 0
> endcase ;
It also works fine without problems.
>
> The disadvantage in the latter case is that the above and below cases
> are separate, needing another branch and possibly increasing the
> number of mispredictions. This can be addressed with:
>
> [undefined] select [if]
> : select ( u1 u2 f -- u )
> if swap then nip ;
> [then]
>
> : tri_mf3.1 { x a b c -- mf }
> x a c within if
> b x x b < a c select blend
> else
> 0
> then ;
This latter gives wrong results:
-100 -50 0 50 tri_mf3.1 . 0 ok \ this is true
-50 -50 0 50 tri_mf3.1 . -4900 ok \ false, must be 0
-10 -50 0 50 tri_mf3.1 . -900 ok \ false, must be 80
0 -50 0 50 tri_mf3.1 . \ here division by zero
*the terminal*:47:12: error: Division by zero
0 -50 0 50 >>>tri_mf3.1<<< .
I think it must be:
(the true/false flag must on tos for select as you defined it)
: tri_mf3.1 { x a b c -- mf }
x a c within if
b x a c x b < select blend
else
0
then ;
and this one works fine.
-100 -50 0 50 tri_mf3.1 . 0 ok
-50 -50 0 50 tri_mf3.1 . 0 ok
-10 -50 0 50 tri_mf3.1 . 80 ok
0 -50 0 50 tri_mf3.1 . 100 ok
10 -50 0 50 tri_mf3.1 . 80 ok
50 -50 0 50 tri_mf3.1 . 0 ok
100 -50 0 50 tri_mf3.1 . 0 ok
>
> In Gforth (development) SELECT is a primitive which hopefully does not
> branch; in that case you have only one branch here.
>
> - anton
Ahmed
--