Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!news.nk.ca!rocksolid2!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: hitlong@yahoo.com (gharnagel)
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Subject: Re: A short proof of the inconsistency of The Shit
Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2024 04:23:15 +0000
Organization: novaBBS
Message-ID: <6f245833fb3cc5f325c276e2d0ead734@www.novabbs.com>
References: <17ee15afea6b29a3$410850$558427$c2065a8b@news.newsdemon.com> <c519bd5f0f4086da711ede104860ed8e@www.novabbs.com> <17eeb977c7724ff7$459327$558427$c2065a8b@news.newsdemon.com> <694f454547a8e56961b6896086a119f8@www.novabbs.com> <17eede9524f9dfa3$533525$505064$c2265aab@news.newsdemon.com> <916be12c0817f8d3d361d8265d8c57d5@www.novabbs.com> <17eefed3289d061e$484574$558427$c2065a8b@news.newsdemon.com> <9da205dae3661a1709fed8ec149b04d3@www.novabbs.com> <17ef02dd9f274dac$613242$505029$c2365abb@news.newsdemon.com> <6924ff328199394116710ac198f103e2@www.novabbs.com> <17ef2dc9521ac81e$518524$546728$c2565adb@news.newsdemon.com> <cf4da5f0623e38e6ea143cc17baa3df8@www.novabbs.com> <17ef49d04f9ca728$637458$505029$c2365abb@news.newsdemon.com> <99644ad5bf4316e8ad0c33c2c88186c8@www.novabbs.com> <17ef4f5375487563$506650$558427$c2065a8b@news.newsdemon.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Info: i2pn2.org;
	logging-data="4051234"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org";
	posting-account="p+/k+WRPC4XqxRx3JUZcWF5fRnK/u/hzv6aL21GRPZM";
User-Agent: Rocksolid Light
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0
X-Rslight-Posting-User: 47dad9ee83da8658a9a980eb24d2d25075d9b155
X-Rslight-Site: $2y$10$eKLKQNuqxF7O25zPYaF9VeP2SW2mr9pabZ8FTW9vhhfFalgE4sf2O
Bytes: 5490
Lines: 103

On Mon, 26 Aug 2024 15:00:01 +0000, Maciej Wozniak wrote:
>
> W dniu 26.08.2024 o 16:35, gharnagel pisze:
> >
> > On Mon, 26 Aug 2024 13:19:02 +0000, Maciej Wozniak wrote:
> > >
> > > So, the physics of your idiot guru had no definition
> > > of second? Will you be impudent enough for such
> > > an absurd lie, trash?
> >
> > Copying and pasting falsehoods seems to be Wozniak's
> > stock in trade.
>
> Desperate avoiding of answerring simple questions
> seems to be Harmagel's stock in trade. Do you
> think that the answer will change just because
> of your refusing to spell it?

The only "questions" Wozniak asks are dishonest ones,
like "When are you going to stop beating your wife?"
There was absolutely NOTHING about a second's
definition in his original post.  He has added that
after his false assertion was revealed for what it
was: a lie.  Just like this one is:

> > > The one Harmagel has deleted GPS clocks
> > > from?
> >
> > Wozniak is being deceitful since the problem he posed
> > [added back in because Wozniak deleted it because he
> > found ti to be devastating to his false narrative]
> > had to do with an observer moving at c/s, which has
> > nothing to do with the GPS.  Dishonest people try to
> > change the narrative when they realize their vacuous
> > assertions are refuted.
>
> Oh, it's just a reminding that you're
> a reality denying idiot, just like all
> Einstein's worshippers.

"When the debate is lost, slander becomes the tool of
the losers. -- Socrates

> >  The only way Wozniak can argue that 86400
> > seconds per day is valid for the moving observer
> > is by asserting Newtonian (universal) time.
>
> A lie, as expected from a piece of
> relativistic shit. It's a direct
> consequence of a definition, valid
> in your moronic physics up to 1960-ies,
> and making the insane mumble of your
> idiot guru not even a consistent one.

https://psychcentral.com/blog/psychology-self/2019/08/narcissists-blame-projection#1

> > > I'm only applying the definition of second,
> > > valid in the whole physics (including The
> > > Shit of your idiot guru) up to 1960-ies.
> >
> > Wozniak is lying since he was informed that a day
> > on earth isn't a day on other planets, so 86400
> > seconds only refers to earth.
>
> Harmagel is lying since he knows very well
> that my example is about measuring Earth's
> day.

Wozniak is lying again because he claimed earlier
no measurements were made.  It was a definition and
a prediction.  Wozniak is definitely a turtle now
because I predicted it then.  Does he now remember
now? :-))

> Nothing unexpected from a fanatic of The
> Shit, of course.

Nothing unexpected from a fanatical congenital
liar and slanderer who cowardly runs away from
facing the proof that his assertions are vacuous
nonsense:

And he continues to lie by omission because he
can't defend his flimsy assertions by the clod,
hard facts which refute them:

https://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/Relativity/SR/experiments.html

https://www.nist.gov/news-events/news/2010/09/nist-pair-aluminum-atomic-clocks-reveal-einsteins-relativity-personal-scale

https://www.nature.com/articles/nature.2014.15970

"Experiments at a particle accelerator in Germany confirm
that time moves slower for a moving clock than for a
stationary one."

And THAT's why the moving observer would observe a day on
earth consuming 99766 of his seconds while he would also
observe a clock on the earth ticking away 86400 seconds.

Thus, relativity's prediction accurately matches what
happens in the real world.  Wozniak's vapid assertion
is completely refuted, so he cowardly runs away and
hides from the truth.