Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder2.eternal-september.org!news.quux.org!news.nk.ca!rocksolid2!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: tomyee3@gmail.com (ProkaryoticCaspaseHomolog)
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Subject: Re: Weakness in the results of the three tests of GR shown in rhe lasr
 century,.
Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2024 10:32:33 +0000
Organization: novaBBS
Message-ID: <6f39fe3f486d9323a02eb24f8cbd9857@www.novabbs.com>
References: <52e47bd51177fb5ca4e51c4c255be1a6@www.novabbs.com> <26ec5dc08548f7ca167c178333b2009d@www.novabbs.com> <9ee53574f9a20a5a9d9ed159d5c474b3@www.novabbs.com> <f9f73c8dd7970dacb7ac095847095d8b@www.novabbs.com> <02a3ec2d6e0227716a14f854e64b8a27@www.novabbs.com> <83224561f48101ccdde65215817f0508@www.novabbs.com> <ddffba4d48e6c45e43ce4d92c1722a2b@www.novabbs.com> <6c4e2acbcecd3dcc0f34bd1be69fea3e@www.novabbs.com> <c70154631f945cac40dfcaa9693c225e@www.novabbs.com> <b0ca0da5d500e501b3f5ebf79c93900c@www.novabbs.com> <d6cc121d9548e5e975093302d3f0b356@www.novabbs.com> <37a3c7fe54315132c3df416a0ba75b3a@www.novabbs.com> <vfu9d5$2ars8$1@dont-email.me> <307001ea0d828780884824d612e7f854@www.novabbs.com> <vfvhek$2kb55$1@dont-email.me> <acbe19482200319c36742e587017080c@www.novabbs.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Info: i2pn2.org;
	logging-data="434935"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org";
	posting-account="Ooch2ht+q3xfrepY75FKkEEx2SPWDQTvfft66HacveI";
User-Agent: Rocksolid Light
X-Rslight-Posting-User: 504a4e36a1e6a0679da537f565a179f60d7acbd8
X-Rslight-Site: $2y$10$PXwCJz0XqqTOOuvJlGP8UeYFMRhPLX2tsfOc3yFVJp.Ut4N/OudnK
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0
Bytes: 3855
Lines: 38

On Thu, 31 Oct 2024 18:44:59 +0000, rhertz wrote:

> It has to be noted that the driving forces behind the support of
> relativism have been relying on (since the 60s) in COMPUTER SCIENCES,
> MASSIVE AMOUNT OF GATHERED DATA and STATISTICAL MANIPULATION OF RESULTS,
> being that a common occurrence is that:
>
> 1) Raw original data IS NEVER AVAILABLE outside a small circle of
> people.

Original Hipparcos transit data is available through the ESA Archives,
and in fact has been resorted to in cases where it was believed that
the original data was corrupted. For instance, multiple objects in the
Hipparcos catalog have been identified as artifacts of scattered light
resulting from the scanned 0.9 degree strip of sky, recorded over some
particular 10 hour interval, having passed adjacent to a bright star.

After registration, you will be free to access the raw data for
yourself. Please bear in mind though, that the raw data comprises
several thousand strips each containing one-dimensional positions of
stars recorded in an 0.9 degree wide strip scanned over 10 hours
along a "great circle". Each strip typically provides 2,000 or so
1-D star positions. These 1-D star positions must be corrected for
stellar aberration, which varies during the orbit. When you perform
*YOUR* analysis, of course, I expect that you will refuse to allow
for relativistic effects. Good luck.

The data from thousands of great circle strips must be correlated to
each other before it is possible to obtain a 2-D map. This initial
map must be iterated multiple times because, among other things,
stellar aberration can vary significantly over the width of a strip,
and stellar positions will change due to proper motion between one
strip recording and another, etc. etc. Also, because you will be
deliberately refusing to allow for relativistic effects, I expect
that your residuals will be rather high.

It's much easier to work with the reduced data. But then, you believe
that the reduced data has been falsified for the sole purpose of
maintaining relativistic mythology.