Warning: mysqli::__construct(): (HY000/1203): User howardkn already has more than 'max_user_connections' active connections in D:\Inetpub\vhosts\howardknight.net\al.howardknight.net\includes\artfuncs.php on line 21
Failed to connect to MySQL: (1203) User howardkn already has more than 'max_user_connections' active connections
Warning: mysqli::query(): Couldn't fetch mysqli in D:\Inetpub\vhosts\howardknight.net\al.howardknight.net\index.php on line 66
Article <6fc2b201f8f59a9543a8c08313677fd6b7114025@i2pn2.org>
Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<6fc2b201f8f59a9543a8c08313677fd6b7114025@i2pn2.org>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!i2pn.org!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: joes <noreply@example.org>
Newsgroups: comp.theory
Subject: Re: Richard seems to continue to blatantly lie -- I hope I am wrong
 about this
Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2024 18:25:04 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: i2pn2 (i2pn.org)
Message-ID: <6fc2b201f8f59a9543a8c08313677fd6b7114025@i2pn2.org>
References: <v644pn$29t4h$3@dont-email.me>
	<5e6e8072022c865ced4b1a1de23b786bc05c22ce@i2pn2.org>
	<v64qr3$2e7d4$1@dont-email.me>
	<0354c808b6aa23146776ec5ad6eed3b66cab2713@i2pn2.org>
	<v64tur$2emil$1@dont-email.me>
	<6020931f5638c63badea7d322cc5c555022c0f40@i2pn2.org>
	<v6ik5u$199c1$1@dont-email.me> <v6imf9$19np0$1@dont-email.me>
	<v6jhjl$1ctoi$7@dont-email.me> <v6lbu7$1qek5$1@dont-email.me>
	<v6m2nn$1tj30$5@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2024 18:25:04 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: i2pn2.org;
	logging-data="2822467"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org";
	posting-account="nS1KMHaUuWOnF/ukOJzx6Ssd8y16q9UPs1GZ+I3D0CM";
User-Agent: Pan/0.145 (Duplicitous mercenary valetism; d7e168a
 git.gnome.org/pan2)
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0
Bytes: 2272
Lines: 24

Am Wed, 10 Jul 2024 08:35:51 -0500 schrieb olcott:
> On 7/10/2024 2:06 AM, Mikko wrote:
>> On 2024-07-09 14:31:17 +0000, olcott said:

>> The C language and all versions of x86 instruction set are so
>> complcated that it is harder to prove anything about them.
> *C is about the simplest full programming language that exists*
> Once you understands sequence, selection, iteration and function calls
> you know the essence of the whole language.
Then why not use some untyped pseudocode?

> All that you need to understand is that the first four instructions of
> DDD correctly emulated by HHH do some housekeeping and then call
> HHH(DDD) with no conditional branch escape from endless repetition.
> *The C code says this even more simply*
> void DDD()
> {
>    HHH(DDD);
> }
Ah, there we go. Nothing about x86 semantics.
This program halts exactly iff HHH halts.

-- 
Am Fri, 28 Jun 2024 16:52:17 -0500 schrieb olcott:
Objectively I am a genius.