| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<6hcc1k57rk5plu40u8l8qd1oq471hmnqip@4ax.com> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design Subject: Re: Grand Apagon - Electricity (not) in Spain Date: Sat, 03 May 2025 08:12:54 -0700 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 78 Message-ID: <6hcc1k57rk5plu40u8l8qd1oq471hmnqip@4ax.com> References: <vuqgef$1of93$1@dont-email.me> <vuqogf$1vlqj$1@dont-email.me> <vuqsdb$2497h$1@dont-email.me> <vusgmj$3lvur$2@dont-email.me> <1rbln2a.1frrgzg19gl8fgN%liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid> <vuvter$2p1lu$1@dont-email.me> <1rbnzz7.115dcvm12d1xs0N%liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid> <vv0bp3$34itv$3@dont-email.me> <vv25ad$r3ti$1@dont-email.me> <7gehelxbkf.ln2@Telcontar.valinor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Sat, 03 May 2025 17:12:55 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="94a70cb56a0048598be5fda3bb796ae1"; logging-data="3982158"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/+dfMyagFqp8ZkmodDHBoG" User-Agent: ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272 Cancel-Lock: sha1:gH3YbhdlL1bCp1NAX+OsiLJFqL0= Bytes: 4912 On Sat, 3 May 2025 14:24:07 +0200, "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> wrote: >On 2025-05-02 12:03, Martin Brown wrote: >> On 01/05/2025 18:41, Bill Sloman wrote: >>> On 2/05/2025 2:21 am, Liz Tuddenham wrote: >>>> Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> wrote: >>>> >>>>> On 30/04/2025 7:59 pm, Liz Tuddenham wrote: >>>>>> Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> ... pumped hydro storage has the spinning >>>>>>> turbines, but grid scale batteries have invereters, which can >>>>>>> reacta lot >>>>>>> faster than any spinning turbine, >>>>>> >>>>>> I thought the stabilising effect of a spinning turbine was because it >>>>>> *didn't* react quickly. >>>>>> >>>>>> The grid frequency begins to fall so energy from the moving parts is >>>>>> converted to electrical power which is fed into the grid to increase. >>>>>> the frequency. This results in a loss of stored mechanical energy >>>>>> which >>>>>> causes the turbine to begin slowing down - which is detected by the >>>>>> control system and used to feed more water/gas/steam into the >>>>>> turbine so >>>>>> its speed is returned to normal. >>>>>> >>>>>> The interface between the stored mechanical energy and the electrical >>>>>> energy demand has an almost instant response and is inherently stable >>>>>> without needing elaborate control algorithms. >>>>> >>>>> But it isn't actually doing anything. >>>> >>>> Yes it is, basic electrical engineering theory. >>>> >>>> In effect it is a constant speed generator connected to variable load; >>>> increase the load and more electrical energy immediately flows into the >>>> load, taking mechanical energy from the inertia of the moving parts. >>>> They then begin to slow down and the much more heavily damped mechanical >>>> regulator feeds in more energy to them from the primary source. >>> >>> So it is completely passive. A big battery isn't a primary source but >>> it can provide enough DC current to let your grid scale inverter >>> generate exactly the AC output that you need. >> >> There is a surprising amount of kinetic energy that can be stored in a >> flywheel or other rotating piece of big heavy machinery. The grid has >> adopted large scale solar PV and wind farms with some very flaky >> inverter technology whose interractions are not at all well understood. >> >> One of the internal reports I was reading recently mentioned that they >> were thinking about funding a PhD to look into some of the complexities. >> It is pretty clear that the system is not well thought out. >> >>> Why futz around with the rotating metal? It may entertain tourists, >>> but that's really all that it is good for. >> >> Because it was always just there and now that it isn't the replacement >> inverters on many of the big installations are nowhere near good enough >> at simulating the required behaviour. They are too inclined to drop off >> and save themselves (much like nuclear plant also does). I suspect that >> Spain doesn't have a great deal of battery storage or pumped water. > >Network grade batteries, none, I believe. There are plans for water >pump/generators. Some of the islands do have them. > >It seems that solar panels and wind farms mostly have the type of >inverter that follow the shape of the voltage already in the grid, with >detection to bail out if things go nuts. There is the suspicion that >this was at least part of the problem. > >But there is another type of inverters that force the shape, ie, >simulate inertia. Where do they get the energy from?