Path: ...!2.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!newsfeed.bofh.team!news.nntp4.net!news.hispagatos.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: rek2 hispagatos <rek2@hispagatos.org.invalid>
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.misc
Subject: Re: Good email clients?
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2024 01:32:56 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: Hispagatos
Message-ID: <uv7ek8$3dna$3@matrix.hispagatos.org>
References: <uv67pj$10oh2$2@dont-email.me>
 <bfriekxtsi.ln2@Telcontar.valinor> <66170ab6@news.ausics.net>
Reply-To: ReK2 <rek2@hispagatos.org>
Injection-Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2024 01:32:56 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: matrix.hispagatos.org;
	logging-data="112362"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@hispagatos.org"
User-Agent: slrn/pre1.0.4-9 (Linux)
Bytes: 2007
Lines: 25

On 2024-04-10, Computer Nerd Kev <not@telling.you.invalid> wrote:
> Carlos E.R. <robin_listas@es.invalid> wrote:
>> On 2024-04-10 16:30, candycanearter07 wrote:
>>> I was wondering if anyone would reccomend a good email client. I'm
>>> mostly just looking for one that has notification support, but the ones
>>> I have looked at have had problems.
>> 
>> Thunderbird is probably the most complete one, followed by Evolution and 
>> Kmail.
>
> Yikes, I found both Thunderbird and Evolution excruciatingly
> bloated and over-complicated, so I'd better stay well away from
> "Kmail". Those do both attempt accurate HTML rendering though,
> unlike clients I prefer such as Sylpheed and Alpine that roughly
> (but often very servicably) render HTML as plain text. That
> contributes a fair bit to their complexity, but hardly excuses how
> unfriendly they can be to configure, or to fix when they break.
>

I agree 100%, aerc or neomutt etc for me are the best email
clients and they also do whatever you need.

-- 
- {gemini,https}://{,rek2.}hispagatos.org - mastodon: @rek2@hispagatos.space
- [https|gemini]://2600.Madrid            - https://hispagatos.space/@rek2
- https://keyoxide.org/A31C7CE19D9C58084EA42BA26C0B0D11E9303EC5