Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<700c7b08f8c38d6604e202c012078556c536af93@i2pn2.org>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!i2pn.org!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: joes <noreply@example.org>
Newsgroups: sci.math
Subject: Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers"
Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2025 14:10:39 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: i2pn2 (i2pn.org)
Message-ID: <700c7b08f8c38d6604e202c012078556c536af93@i2pn2.org>
References: <vqrbtd$1chb7$2@solani.org> <vr1bav$p45$1@news.muc.de>
	<vr1e8i$1er2v$1@dont-email.me> <vr1hig$5qt$1@news.muc.de>
	<vr29g3$23fi7$3@dont-email.me> <vr2d3k$jli$1@news.muc.de>
	<vr3fbu$1gbs1$3@solani.org> <vr3pvd$20r1$1@news.muc.de>
	<vr4cgl$3qbcs$3@dont-email.me> <vr6fgl$1uok$1@news.muc.de>
	<vr6tit$21dt9$1@dont-email.me> <vr71ea$qjf$1@news.muc.de>
	<vr774e$2a6rj$2@dont-email.me> <vr7b30$qjf$2@news.muc.de>
	<vr7jql$2jj8r$4@dont-email.me> <vr92l8$1pc1$1@news.muc.de>
	<vr9gla$bvhh$1@dont-email.me> <vrbn3b$2d16$1@news.muc.de>
	<vrc3ps$2og7j$1@dont-email.me>
	<5d4e93233370e24f89417e1dd62b44763cbc47f5@i2pn2.org>
	<vre3cq$ishj$2@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2025 14:10:39 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: i2pn2.org;
	logging-data="822630"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org";
	posting-account="nS1KMHaUuWOnF/ukOJzx6Ssd8y16q9UPs1GZ+I3D0CM";
User-Agent: Pan/0.145 (Duplicitous mercenary valetism; d7e168a
 git.gnome.org/pan2)
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0
Bytes: 2489
Lines: 20

Am Wed, 19 Mar 2025 10:39:38 +0100 schrieb WM:
> On 18.03.2025 21:40, joes wrote:
>> Am Tue, 18 Mar 2025 16:34:21 +0100 schrieb WM:
>>> On 18.03.2025 12:57, Alan Mackenzie wrote:
>>>> WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> wrote:
>>>
>>>>> The set of FISONs is an inductive set. But it is not ℕ because ∀n ∈
>>>>> UF: |ℕ \ {1, 2, 3, ..., n}| = ℵo.
>>>> That "because" doesn't hold
>>> Because you say so? That's not significant. Even if you can't
>>> understand the correct argument, it is decisive: ℕ_def contains all
>>> numbers the subtraction of which from ℕ does not result in the empty
>>> set. Obviously the subtraction of all numbers which cannot empty ℕ
>>> cannot empty ℕ.
>> There are many such sets: N\{0}, N\{1}, N\{2}, ...
> ℕ_def contains only numbers with FISONs. N\{0} is not a FISON.
It contains only numbers with FISONs.

-- 
Am Sat, 20 Jul 2024 12:35:31 +0000 schrieb WM in sci.math:
It is not guaranteed that n+1 exists for every n.