Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!i2pn.org!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org>
Newsgroups: sci.math
Subject: Re: How many different unit fractions are lessorequal than all unit
 fractions?
Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2024 07:08:31 -0400
Organization: i2pn2 (i2pn.org)
Message-ID: <704ce4179fc0c83237dc41c6d721651e2fc2fd7f@i2pn2.org>
References: <vb4rde$22fb4$2@solani.org> <vc7dk3$2b1g9$2@dont-email.me>
 <1aabd037-86bc-47bd-b402-f6b29c5c33e4@att.net> <vcehl6$2boc$3@dont-email.me>
 <f1d14b16-2c12-4cfb-b7f5-c58cc5724f94@att.net> <vcguvh$hi5j$1@dont-email.me>
 <b7eb4682-30db-4b37-90b4-0135e995cfc1@att.net> <vckekf$1709o$1@dont-email.me>
 <298dcb6f-5f58-48b6-80e3-34260bf721f8@att.net> <vcn8n8$1nfqa$1@dont-email.me>
 <283c426f-ab1c-4ef0-a06c-1bf7d28a2cfa@att.net> <vcpo5e$29qe5$1@dont-email.me>
 <6b50a171-8127-4ce6-9bd3-2dc213638e9b@att.net> <vcroj3$2nfvb$2@dont-email.me>
 <519db81b-4a4d-417d-8cd2-7fef5a342efd@att.net>
 <6704347e-2f99-40f2-887f-de93f6fdd659@tha.de>
 <d10dbfab-9235-4fcd-a892-b407029e8f1d@att.net>
 <8b3e744d-3419-40c3-a7c6-fe59edd528a9@tha.de>
 <851e9929-8ab7-49d1-b478-e65c61fba2e3@att.net> <vd1bis$3njbp$7@dont-email.me>
 <57dcb3994f147ebe5799308cad2ae1c8ac57e891@i2pn2.org>
 <vd6u9v$qj9u$1@dont-email.me>
 <7abe154e30ca0ffa4435c790a1b6c5c2ed786b5b@i2pn2.org>
 <vdc7se$1rn7o$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2024 11:08:31 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: i2pn2.org;
	logging-data="4137049"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org";
	posting-account="diqKR1lalukngNWEqoq9/uFtbkm5U+w3w6FQ0yesrXg";
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <vdc7se$1rn7o$1@dont-email.me>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0
Bytes: 2937
Lines: 33

On 9/29/24 2:56 PM, WM wrote:
> On 27.09.2024 22:12, joes wrote:
>> Am Fri, 27 Sep 2024 20:42:06 +0200 schrieb WM:
>>> On 25.09.2024 18:39, joes wrote:
>>>> Am Wed, 25 Sep 2024 17:51:56 +0200 schrieb WM:
>>>
>>>>> NUF(x) distinguishes all points.
>>>> How does it distinguish dark points?
>>> By our mathematical knowledge about ∀n ∈ ℕ: 1/n - 1/(n+1) > 0
>> How can you talk about a dark n and it’s (maybe) n+1?
> 
> I assume that dark n exist and follow the rules of visible n, with one 
> exception.

So, you admit that your "proof" about dark numbers is based on the 
assumption that they exist.

In other words, you admit your logic is flawed and based on fallacies.


>>
>>>>> NUF increases. At no point it can increase by more than 1.
>>>> Right, and there is no point "next to" 0
>>> There is a unit fraction next to 0.
>> Is it closer to zero or to the next UF?
> 
> That is unknown.

Because you don't actually know anything because you have lied to 
yourself so much.

> 
> Regards, WM