Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<717f9968c58e0bc93376036f59ab3a4a@www.novabbs.com> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!i2pn.org!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: hitlong@yahoo.com (gharnagel) Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity Subject: Re: The most ridiculous science mistake in history. Date: Sun, 24 Mar 2024 02:59:13 +0000 Organization: novaBBS Message-ID: <717f9968c58e0bc93376036f59ab3a4a@www.novabbs.com> References: <eadae7722aa4042797d8a9dd39fac8b4@www.novabbs.com> <d6405f95623225463eb8f7a1e5b7237e@www.novabbs.com> <5284c6fb7317102558698e998fba0c97@www.novabbs.com> <fe412597fe4d18502dae35d0ea0c0346@www.novabbs.com> <17be6430b4bcca16$341238$167876$c2065a8b@news.newsdemon.com> <16c649f5fbd97f53353ad110bf1b3da7@www.novabbs.com> <33bd1dfad0ec93e1699461d641945399@www.novabbs.com> <528e27e9c6435751ed1379e167ebd0d8@www.novabbs.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: i2pn2.org; logging-data="3014888"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org"; posting-account="t+lO0yBNO1zGxasPvGSZV1BRu71QKx+JE37DnW+83jQ"; User-Agent: Rocksolid Light X-Rslight-Posting-User: 47dad9ee83da8658a9a980eb24d2d25075d9b155 X-Rslight-Site: $2y$10$G6w6k59W.ihsPy5FlrXszeK17bo.ozR5essVij2CFl/yIhFR8RHnW X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0 Bytes: 2303 Lines: 24 Larry wrote: > > Gary, your opinion is so worthless to me the only reason I read it this time is because > this new forum has so few comments so far. Of course it's worthless to you, because you ignore the facts. Your mind is made up and you don't want to be jarred into reality. > The relativists here haven't said anything ever that would persuade a reasonable person Perhaps you're not a "reasonable" person. Ever think of that? > inquiring after the truth about nature. But are you really doing that? > Non-Euclidean geometry is warped. How so? You're not going to convince a "reasonable" person of that just by saying so. > Nothing said by the relativists here even attempts to persuade skeptics. There are two kinds of "skeptics": Those who don't confront the facts and those who do (those who entertain fictitious" facts and those who face reality). The question is, what facts aren't you confronting and what fictitious facts are you entertaining?