Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<71951787b5f1c60661ff5e5c10adbfe2@www.novabbs.com> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!news.nk.ca!rocksolid2!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: hertz778@gmail.com (rhertz) Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity Subject: Re: I dare to relativists to explain local time: =?UTF-8?B?dC12eC9jwrI=?= Date: Sat, 5 Oct 2024 20:39:48 +0000 Organization: novaBBS Message-ID: <71951787b5f1c60661ff5e5c10adbfe2@www.novabbs.com> References: <8dc9a6eb5ee097da5239175cb7833cd6@www.novabbs.com> <ebCdnU-bKuOJYmD7nZ2dnZfqnPGdnZ2d@giganews.com> <6a64a60eb15efe9a5449ade234d05804@www.novabbs.com> <fc3e047c7de75fd713b8844393a5234e@www.novabbs.com> <vds6da$sl6n$1@dont-email.me> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: i2pn2.org; logging-data="727023"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org"; posting-account="OjDMvaaXMeeN/7kNOPQl+dWI+zbnIp3mGAHMVhZ2e/A"; User-Agent: Rocksolid Light X-Rslight-Site: $2y$10$D598rwWNgkUSRQeu4O6uROsWx10MillgUhq34IG1i4VC/FU9klxfi X-Rslight-Posting-User: 26080b4f8b9f153eb24ebbc1b47c4c36ee247939 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0 Bytes: 2494 Lines: 52 On Sat, 5 Oct 2024 20:11:32 +0000, Paul.B.Andersen wrote: > Den 05.10.2024 19:32, skrev rhertz: >> Explain this: >> >> 1905 EINSTEIN'S MODIFIED LORENTZ TRANSFORMS >> t' = γ (t - vx/c²) >> x' = γ (x - vt) >> >> IF >> >> v = 11 Km/sec >> x = 400 Km >> >> γ = 1.00000000067222 > > γ = 1.00000000067315 ≈ 1.000000000673 > >> >> >> t' ≈ t - 48.89 nsec > > wrong, see below > >> >> 48.89 nanoseconds meaning WHAT? > > That your calculation is wrong. > > > You do know that the Lorentz transform is > a coordinate transformation, or don't you? > > If the coordinates of an event are x = 400 km, t = t seconds > in the un-primed frame, then the coordinates of the event > in the primed frame are: > t' = (1.00000000067315⋅t - 48.96e-9) second > x' = (400000.0002692 - 11000.0000074⋅t) meter > > Note that t is a number you failed to define. <snip> DO YOU UNDERSTAND THAT YOU DIDN'T GIVE A SINGLE EXPLANATION ABOUT THE 49 nsec THAT APPEAR DUE TO THE vx/c² FACTOR OF THE LOCAL TIME?. OR WHY THERE IS A DIFFERENCE BETWEEN TIME IN BOTH FRAMES (NOT RELATED TO THE GAMMA FACTO OF TIME DILATION) FOR THIS PARTICULAR SPEED AND POSITION? YOU WRITE, WRITE AND WRITE BUT CAN'T ESCAPE FROM THE FACT THAT YOU DON'T KNOW SHIT ABOUT LOCAL TIME. YOU (AND OTHERS) CAN'T JUST EXPLAIN IT.