Path: news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.quux.org!news.nk.ca!rocksolid2!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: clzb93ynxj@att.net (LaurenceClarkCrossen)
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Subject: Re: New addition to the List of Critics of Relativity
Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2025 22:38:31 +0000
Organization: novaBBS
Message-ID: <7202744769d70cde7b1c9b6339d3f52c@www.novabbs.com>
References: <1rdrgli.1awgoez1fu6irjN%nospam@de-ster.demon.nl> <102c8iu$22g5j$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Info: i2pn2.org;
	logging-data="254119"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org";
	posting-account="HcQFdl4zp4UQRQ9N18ivMn6Fl9V8n4SPkK4oZHLgYdQ";
User-Agent: Rocksolid Light
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0
X-Rslight-Site: $2y$10$WOZETV2vYkZStALyARC8iOkbitT109h.to0uD.VsMGNUYUzPFiGtW
X-Rslight-Posting-User: a2f761a7401f13abeefca3440f16b2f27b708180

On Wed, 11 Jun 2025 15:49:50 +0000, Athel Cornish-Bowden wrote:

> On 2025-06-11 09:35:53 +0000, J. J. Lodder said:
>
>> LaurenceClarkCrossen <clzb93ynxj@att.net> wrote:
>>
>>> Darrell Bender New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology
>>>
>>> Bender, D. (2025). "The Dying of a Principle: The Bending of Light, the
>>> Oppenheimer-Snyder Gravitational Contraction, and the Postulate of
>>> Relativity"
>>> European Journal of Applied Sciences, Vol. 13(02). 505-546.
>>>
>>> "Considering Einstein's relativity theories, which we have repeatedly
>>> shown to be blatantly false, and the constant stream of corruption,
>>> misinformation, propaganda, and lies supporting them by the institutions
>>> with big names and the physicists themselves with even bigger names, if
>>> that be possible, than the institutions. The fraud emanates from the
>>> top."
>>
>> Have you actually looked at this 'journal'?
>
> I hadn't previously, but I have now. Any journal that announces itself
> as a "peer-reviewed open access online journal" is showing two red
> flags right there. Anyay, the content is what one would expect. Serious
> journals don't say they're peer reviewed because that's assumed; some
> respectable journals have open access but "open access" is no guarantee.
Peer review is a guarantee that it was carried out in a dark back room
in secret.