| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<72cde964ccfe5b20e307a7770bbd04d5@www.novabbs.com> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!i2pn.org!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: hertz778@gmail.com (rhertz) Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity Subject: Re: Relativity is a pseudoscience II. The Hafele-Keating HOAX, Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2024 17:06:12 +0000 Organization: novaBBS Message-ID: <72cde964ccfe5b20e307a7770bbd04d5@www.novabbs.com> References: <dad338831baa98f3eb1ca50452fd9401@www.novabbs.com> <be051db4136835108537c9497c5dfab8@www.novabbs.com> <e766d5b3f2f87f9604f0937ad65a4284@www.novabbs.com> <3fddf5a7bc291abaf2bc49d856d87fcb@www.novabbs.com> <45ca134f20b357d137e34b1fcdd80764@www.novabbs.com> <f4ec6c0220ab548a18740c2680d12dee@www.novabbs.com> <631323acf0c3dda0238e7c216ad843ab@www.novabbs.com> <8fe67191e5d71c706cc50c05e95ee23b@www.novabbs.com> <67bd6e19bb1d0337420a99583f647508@www.novabbs.com> <70c184ff68360069eb636416a2ccffb1@www.novabbs.com> <cdd2c298f8ae5022cb50ad1287207140@www.novabbs.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: i2pn2.org; logging-data="2668950"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org"; posting-account="hWiuCAeR3KEZYJfTvV11n0qrRi6oqW/zjvEZQQGun9A"; User-Agent: Rocksolid Light X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0 X-Rslight-Posting-User: f685b96694175b2ad43ead343ead0a9c0082fe88 X-Rslight-Site: $2y$10$rcD7NWNdTuFI6nRCupkc4OC4Cb0JOSxivU4NITKZcQEVjI9p92aHW Bytes: 4408 Lines: 72 ****** Before, after, and during the flights, they made continuous clock inter-comparison. These continuous clock inter-comparisons allowed them to detect and compensate for clock glitches. Before, after, and during the flights, they made continuous clock inter-comparison. These continuous clock inter-comparisons allowed them to detect and compensate for clock glitches. ****** Before, after, and during the flights, they made continuous clock inter-comparison. These continuous clock inter-comparisons allowed them to detect and compensate for clock glitches. ****** Before, after, and during the flights, they made continuous clock inter-comparison. These continuous clock inter-comparisons allowed them to detect and compensate for clock glitches. ****** Before, after, and during the flights, they made continuous clock inter-comparison. These continuous clock inter-comparisons allowed them to detect and compensate for clock glitches. ****** You are behaving as a parrot, which can repeat endlessly the same, but you DON'T UNDERSTAND WHAT YOU WRITE (or DON'T WANT TO UNDERSTAND). Your "facepalm" is a sign of your absolute DENIAL about facts WRITTEN BY HAFELE HIMSELF!!! (facepalm). You persist talking about bananas, and I'm talking about oranges! Again: 1) They realized more than 4,500 measurements (using HP 5063 A) of the differences between the FLYING CLOCKS, not against USNO CLOCKS! 2) The ONLY MEASUREMENT ABOUT THE AVERAGE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE FLYING CLOCKS AND THE TWO CLOCKS LOCATED AT THE USNO (WASHINGTON) was performed ONLY at the USNO lab, before and AFTER each flight finished!! 3) NO REAL TIME MEASUREMENTS BETWEEN THE USNO REFERENCE CLOCKS AND THE FLYING CLOCKS WERE MADE DURING THE FLIGHTS, BECAUSE IT WAS (AND STILL IS) TECHNOLOGICALLY IMPOSSIBLE, DUE TO THE TINY DIFFERENCES (NSEC) BETWEEN BOTH ENSEMBLES. TO ACHIEVE SUCH INFO EXCHANGE, A GLOBAL NETWORK FOR TIME SHOULD HAVE EXISTED, IN ORDER TO DISCOUNT THE TRAVEL TIME OF THE DATA BETWEEN (I.E.) TOKIO AND WASHINGTON! EVEN TODAY, USING GPS SYNC AND 1-WAY MICROWAVE LINKS (THROUGH SATELLITES) WOULD FAIL, BECAUSE THE GLOBAL GPS TIME HAS AN AVERAGE SYNC TIME OF +/- 10 NANOSECONDS (ALMOST 25% OF THE DIFFERENCE). WHY DO YOU PERSIST INSISTING ON THIS? ****** Before, after, and during the flights, they made continuous clock inter-comparison. These continuous clock inter-comparisons allowed them to detect and compensate for clock glitches. ****** THESE ARE NOT MEASUREMENT BETWEEN USNO CLOCKS AND H-K CLOCKS, FOR GOD'S SAKE!! I reminded your endless discussions with Dono about your article. Not that Dono is someone that I like, but he's A SOLID EE (AND YOU'RE NOT). As far as I remember, you are a programmer, not an EE. The know-how of an EE with decades of experience in communications CAN'T BE REPLACED with someone with a logical mind (you), but skilled ONLY in SW.