Path: ...!news.misty.com!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!i2pn.org!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org>
Newsgroups: sci.math
Subject: Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers
 (extra-ordinary)
Date: Mon, 23 Dec 2024 09:32:54 -0500
Organization: i2pn2 (i2pn.org)
Message-ID: <733ce219e9d2422859035e5094a7b3e92eea9c47@i2pn2.org>
References: <vg7cp8$9jka$1@dont-email.me>
 <069069bf23698c157ddfd9b62b9b2f632b484c40@i2pn2.org>
 <vjooeq$11n0g$2@dont-email.me>
 <2d3620a6e2a8a57d9db7a33c9d476fe03cac455b@i2pn2.org>
 <vjrfcc$1m1b2$1@dont-email.me>
 <3c08ed64fa6193dc9ab6733b807a5c99a49810aa@i2pn2.org>
 <vjss56$1tr00$2@dont-email.me>
 <357a8740434fb6f1b847130ac3afbd33c850fc37@i2pn2.org>
 <vjv6fb$2dujf$2@dont-email.me>
 <b0c7449413fec43bc18e8d2d67da1c779a350bc2@i2pn2.org>
 <vk1cad$2srst$1@dont-email.me>
 <ceaaf003457afd2e381c8f115a4e691611162ffe@i2pn2.org>
 <vk3g0l$3cjvc$3@dont-email.me> <vk3lv1$3e9se$1@dont-email.me>
 <vk3vh6$3g0a3$1@dont-email.me> <vk4jfi$3k04r$4@dont-email.me>
 <d4d38bb75acc471a684759922b8f8d32707855a8@i2pn2.org>
 <vk6uu7$4f7v$1@dont-email.me>
 <cdd51ad73c172f40f3212801d7afd9eef8e60d47@i2pn2.org>
 <vk936n$khia$1@dont-email.me>
 <787067e5de3c455cb57389315b6821e96bcf86af@i2pn2.org>
 <f713f771-6cdd-44bb-90ab-7300d739f84b@tha.de>
 <1b6f89e7c35e4c9674af5a480e4bab6cb72e0915@i2pn2.org>
 <vkbalq$14tg7$2@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Mon, 23 Dec 2024 14:32:54 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: i2pn2.org;
	logging-data="83888"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org";
	posting-account="diqKR1lalukngNWEqoq9/uFtbkm5U+w3w6FQ0yesrXg";
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Content-Language: en-US
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0
In-Reply-To: <vkbalq$14tg7$2@dont-email.me>
Bytes: 2576
Lines: 21

On 12/23/24 4:31 AM, WM wrote:
> On 23.12.2024 02:01, Richard Damon wrote:
>> On 12/22/24 5:11 PM, WM wrote:
>>> On 22.12.2024 20:10, Richard Damon wrote:
>>>> On 12/22/24 8:11 AM, WM wrote:
>>>
>>>>> Find a natural number that is not in all intervals [1, n] which I use:
>>>>> ∀n ∈ ℕ [1, n].
>>>>
>>>> But you can't use *ALL* intervals, becaue you need to use them 
>>>> individually
>>>
>>> No, I do as Cantor did.
> 
>> No, you do what you THINK Cantor did,
> 
> Show an n that I do not use with all intervals [1, n].
> 
> Regards, WM
> 

The LAST one, which you say must exist to use your logic.