Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<7340a29aa41114bb709f723090759a08@www.novabbs.org> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!i2pn.org!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: mitchalsup@aol.com (MitchAlsup1) Newsgroups: comp.arch Subject: Re: Computer architects leaving Intel... Date: Tue, 3 Sep 2024 20:20:41 +0000 Organization: Rocksolid Light Message-ID: <7340a29aa41114bb709f723090759a08@www.novabbs.org> References: <2024Aug30.161204@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at> <memo.20240830164247.19028y@jgd.cix.co.uk> <vasruo$id3b$1@dont-email.me> <2024Aug30.195831@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at> <vat5ap$jthk$2@dont-email.me> <vaunhb$vckc$1@dont-email.me> <vautmu$vr5r$1@dont-email.me> <2024Aug31.170347@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at> <vavpnh$13tj0$2@dont-email.me> <vb00c2$150ia$1@dont-email.me> <505954890d8461c1f4082b1beecd453c@www.novabbs.org> <vb0kh2$12ukk$1@dont-email.me> <vb3smg$1ta6s$1@dont-email.me> <vb4q5o$12ukk$3@dont-email.me> <vb6a16$38aj5$1@dont-email.me> <jwv8qw8o7zg.fsf-monnier+comp.arch@gnu.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: i2pn2.org; logging-data="749665"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org"; posting-account="65wTazMNTleAJDh/pRqmKE7ADni/0wesT78+pyiDW8A"; User-Agent: Rocksolid Light X-Rslight-Site: $2y$10$qK0xDmal4B2eh46lVwzWJO84Ghogde/cSMoCw3kEJ0u/qSRdP6dOm X-Rslight-Posting-User: ac58ceb75ea22753186dae54d967fed894c3dce8 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0 Bytes: 2212 Lines: 19 On Tue, 3 Sep 2024 19:28:03 +0000, Stefan Monnier wrote: >> My impression - based on hearsay for Rust as I have no experience - is >> that >> the key point of Rust is memory "safety". I use scare-quotes here, >> since it >> is simply about correct use of dynamic memory and buffers. >> >> It is entirely possible to have correct use of memory in C, > > If you look at the evolution of programming languages, "higher-level" > doesn't mean "you can do more stuff". On the contrary, making > a language "higher-level" means deciding what it is we want to make > harder or even impossible. A higher level language simply makes it HARDER to shoot yourself in the foot, not easier to express this-crap or that-crap. > > > Stefan