Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<7387e2f099b81abacc7cf1184a11db86@www.novabbs.com> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!news.nk.ca!rocksolid2!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: tomyee3@gmail.com (ProkaryoticCaspaseHomolog) Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity Subject: Re: Want to prove =?UTF-8?B?RT1tY8KyPyBVbml2ZXJzaXR5IGxhYnMgc2hvdWxkIHRy?= =?UTF-8?B?eSB0aGlzIQ==?= Date: Sun, 24 Nov 2024 17:34:48 +0000 Organization: novaBBS Message-ID: <7387e2f099b81abacc7cf1184a11db86@www.novabbs.com> References: <b00a0cb305a96b0e83d493ad2d2e03e8@www.novabbs.com> <cfcd6e742c4f3c2f8a5f69d4db75206f@www.novabbs.com> <d793169808c9c1e887527df5f967c216@www.novabbs.com> <98a0a1fbdc93a5fcc108882d99718764@www.novabbs.com> <fd4937f7b180bac934eb677cca8f5c55@www.novabbs.com> <ebcad35958736e6602cf803fddfdb0fd@www.novabbs.com> <141e19a1c6acd54116739058391ca9f8@www.novabbs.com> <a4f98fa5d026bfbf5127fcbc6a585772@www.novabbs.com> <aGN%O.47052$2d0b.43303@fx09.ams4> <45ed9424edce8c13db24c1dbb8752c26@www.novabbs.com> <c8df6716ae871b79524720426a3f229a@www.novabbs.com> <7adfc9e5c6884729def0c6a0097c9f37@www.novabbs.com> <humdnTd1BNWduN36nZ2dnZfqn_idnZ2d@giganews.com> <092fa494db9895ba52cfac350be5e744@www.novabbs.com> <afe961104287110aab310b0cc3b5f8ef@www.novabbs.com> <98654d26cc4f5fd326f071ea7d4317b8@www.novabbs.com> <6292a6508a7a1b7e2f7d13951685410d@www.novabbs.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: i2pn2.org; logging-data="3948010"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org"; posting-account="Ooch2ht+q3xfrepY75FKkEEx2SPWDQTvfft66HacveI"; User-Agent: Rocksolid Light X-Rslight-Posting-User: 504a4e36a1e6a0679da537f565a179f60d7acbd8 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0 X-Rslight-Site: $2y$10$52tXwUQ6bgJdmPHMD/iSJeqd2FivrwVvAhr/2oaSnZUNVVjBa8H3C Bytes: 12507 Lines: 276 On Sun, 24 Nov 2024 16:23:34 +0000, rhertz wrote: > On Sun, 24 Nov 2024 10:04:13 +0000, ProkaryoticCaspaseHomolog wrote: > > Just for fun, I posted the last part with calculations to ChatGPT. I > wrote that I disagree with the idea of treating it as a black body > radiation problem. Here is the answer: ChatGPT apparently used markup and/or unicode that did not render properly on NovaBBT. I don't know about other newsreaders. However, I was able to get the gist of what might have been its response. > Let’s go through this text step-by-step and analyze it in detail, > including the key concepts, assumptions, and the areas where you might > disagree or where clarification is needed. > > 1. Overview of the Experimental Setup > The experiment involves injecting a 5-watt green laser into a cavity > made of aluminum. The chamber is initially at room temperature (T_i = > 293 K), and as the laser is introduced, the temperature of the system > increases. The system eventually reaches a steady-state temperature > (T_f), where the heat input from the laser matches the heat lost by the > system. > > Key concepts: > > Steady-State Temperature (T_f): The final temperature when the system > stops warming up, and the heat input (from the laser) equals the heat > output (radiation to the surroundings). > Heat Radiation: The system will have two types of radiation at > steady-state: > Coherent laser light: Reflected inside the chamber and eventually > absorbed. > Black body radiation: Emitted by the chamber walls at temperature T_f. > Heat Absorption by the Walls: The aluminum shell absorbs energy, > increasing its temperature from T_i to T_f. > 2. Calculation of Steady-State Temperature (T_f) > The equation provided to calculate the steady-state temperature is: [UNABLE TO READ MARKUP AND/OR UNICODE] > Where: [UNABLE TO READ MARKUP AND/OR UNICODE] > P is the power input (5 watts), [UNABLE TO READ MARKUP AND/OR UNICODE] > ϵ is the emissivity of aluminum (0.13), [UNABLE TO READ MARKUP AND/OR UNICODE] > σ is the Stefan-Boltzmann constant, [UNABLE TO READ MARKUP AND/OR UNICODE] > is the external area of the sphere (0.03144 m²), [UNABLE TO READ MARKUP AND/OR UNICODE] > is the final temperature, [UNABLE TO READ MARKUP AND/OR UNICODE] > is the initial temperature (293 K). > After rearranging and solving the equation, the result is: [UNABLE TO READ MARKUP AND/OR UNICODE] > =412.5K > This means the temperature of the chamber reaches 412.5 K after the > system has stabilized. This is a significant rise from the initial > temperature of 293 K, indicating the laser’s energy input has caused a > substantial increase in temperature. > > 3. Black Body Radiation Energy > The energy corresponding to the black body radiation inside the chamber > is given by: [UNABLE TO READ MARKUP AND/OR UNICODE] > U=aVT [UNABLE TO READ MARKUP AND/OR UNICODE] > Where: [UNABLE TO READ MARKUP AND/OR UNICODE] > U is the total black body energy, [UNABLE TO READ MARKUP AND/OR UNICODE] > a is the radiation constant, [UNABLE TO READ MARKUP AND/OR UNICODE] > V is the volume of the sphere, [UNABLE TO READ MARKUP AND/OR UNICODE] > T is the temperature. > The initial and final black body energies are calculated as: [UNABLE TO READ MARKUP AND/OR UNICODE] > The increase in black body energy is: [UNABLE TO READ MARKUP AND/OR UNICODE] > This increase is relatively small compared to the thermal energy stored > in the aluminum shell, as the laser’s energy is primarily absorbed by > the walls and converted into thermal energy. > > 4. Thermal Energy in the Aluminum Shell > The increase in thermal energy in the aluminum shell is calculated based > on the temperature rise from T_i to T_f (119.5 K). The text states the > increase in thermal energy in the foil is 220 J. This is a much larger > value than the change in black body radiation energy, which suggests > that the majority of the energy input is being absorbed by the aluminum > shell and not the cavity’s radiation. > > 5. Laser Energy Inside the Chamber > The equation given for the laser energy inside the cavity is: [UNABLE TO READ MARKUP AND/OR UNICODE] > Where: [UNABLE TO READ MARKUP AND/OR UNICODE] > P is the power of the laser (5 watts), [UNABLE TO READ MARKUP AND/OR UNICODE] > D is the average distance between bounces inside the chamber (0.07 m), [UNABLE TO READ MARKUP AND/OR UNICODE] > c is the speed of light, [UNABLE TO READ MARKUP AND/OR UNICODE] > R is the reflectivity of the aluminum (0.99). > The final laser energy within the chamber after reaching steady-state is > calculated as: [UNABLE TO READ MARKUP AND/OR UNICODE] > This is a very small amount compared to the thermal energy stored in the > shell (220 J), which aligns with the idea that most of the laser’s > energy is absorbed by the shell and only a tiny fraction remains as > coherent laser light inside the cavity. > > 6. Other Considerations: Vacuum vs Air > The author mentions that the experiment is likely performed in a vacuum. > If the experiment were conducted in air, convection currents would > interfere with the measurements, and the computation of the final > temperature would become more complex. This is a valid point, as in a > vacuum there are no convective heat losses, and the temperature rise > would be more directly attributable to radiation absorption. ChatGPT didn't really seem to get the point that the air currents would push the sphere around by unacceptable amounts. > 7. Discussion of Emissivity and Reflectivity > The author mentions that the emissivity of aluminum (0.13) plays a > significant role in the final temperature. Emissivity reflects how > effectively a material emits thermal radiation compared to a perfect > black body (which has an emissivity of 1). The relatively low emissivity > of aluminum means that much of the thermal energy is retained in the > aluminum shell, and only a fraction of it is radiated away. > > The reflectivity of aluminum (0.99) is also important, as it indicates > how much of the laser light is reflected within the cavity. This high > reflectivity implies that the laser light will bounce around multiple ========== REMAINDER OF ARTICLE TRUNCATED ==========