| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<75740dedb5041bfadbbe4571e22e4ff345cd93bf@i2pn2.org> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!news.nk.ca!rocksolid2!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: joes <noreply@example.org> Newsgroups: sci.math Subject: Re: Replacement of Cardinality Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2024 18:14:28 -0000 (UTC) Organization: i2pn2 (i2pn.org) Message-ID: <75740dedb5041bfadbbe4571e22e4ff345cd93bf@i2pn2.org> References: <hsRF8g6ZiIZRPFaWbZaL2jR1IiU@jntp> <en_fjxuLKegQPxOwdC8lXsKVbbI@jntp> <b6f3db1f122addc847d551f14766c9bc090a2d39@i2pn2.org> <va1ra4$3bld7$1@dont-email.me> <cB1y4KsEseyrfvMXAJJ2TijMcX4@jntp> <va31ko$3havl$1@dont-email.me> <VqqLFKi62z9rl82Gg4Mxsdp4YYg@jntp> <va4h96$3r7nv$1@dont-email.me> <H5iV5HXUBwUzWtVKRZj7h4N2LdA@jntp> <ff390a80279179f6d2f4660ed19c150a88c787d6@i2pn2.org> <fTsvmGSlASVzQ_XgoQ2SIVFhqpg@jntp> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2024 18:14:28 -0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: i2pn2.org; logging-data="3325568"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org"; posting-account="nS1KMHaUuWOnF/ukOJzx6Ssd8y16q9UPs1GZ+I3D0CM"; User-Agent: Pan/0.145 (Duplicitous mercenary valetism; d7e168a git.gnome.org/pan2) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0 Bytes: 2044 Lines: 20 Am Wed, 21 Aug 2024 14:58:50 +0000 schrieb WM: > Le 21/08/2024 à 15:13, joes a écrit : >> Am Wed, 21 Aug 2024 12:24:14 +0000 schrieb WM: > >>> It is an end which proves dark numbers. >> Why should there be an end in the first place? > > There is indisputably an interval without unit fractions, namely (-oo, > 0]. > That indicates an end before. It proves an end before. Only cranks can > deny that. The unit fractions get denser toward 0. They are all positive. >> Are there not infinitely many unit fractions? > Yes, the dark unit fractions cannot be counted through. There are more > than can be counted. I was talking about the regular ones. -- Am Sat, 20 Jul 2024 12:35:31 +0000 schrieb WM in sci.math: It is not guaranteed that n+1 exists for every n.