Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!i2pn.org!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org>
Newsgroups: sci.logic
Subject: Re: I just fixed the loophole of the Gettier cases
Date: Sun, 1 Sep 2024 07:06:40 -0400
Organization: i2pn2 (i2pn.org)
Message-ID: <7594a2e38ee0fb8df1a9424e6d6b05103c31cf1f@i2pn2.org>
References: <vb0lj5$1c1kh$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Sun, 1 Sep 2024 11:06:40 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: i2pn2.org;
	logging-data="465775"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org";
	posting-account="diqKR1lalukngNWEqoq9/uFtbkm5U+w3w6FQ0yesrXg";
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Content-Language: en-US
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0
In-Reply-To: <vb0lj5$1c1kh$1@dont-email.me>
Bytes: 1503
Lines: 17

On 8/31/24 11:04 PM, olcott wrote:
> *I just fixed the loophole of the Gettier cases*
> 
> knowledge is a justified true belief such that the
> justification is sufficient reason to accept the
> truth of the belief.
> 
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gettier_problem
> 

No, you just became a good example of the sort of thing that becomes the 
loophole.

You clearly don't understand the problem, because you don't understand 
that the observer doesn't know enough to determine if the reasoning is 
sufficient.

Sorry, you are just too stupid to understand your stupidity,