| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<759895764b7eac2588614211bee40fc745ca47f2@i2pn2.org> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!i2pn.org!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: joes <noreply@example.org> Newsgroups: sci.math Subject: Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers" Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2025 14:15:48 -0000 (UTC) Organization: i2pn2 (i2pn.org) Message-ID: <759895764b7eac2588614211bee40fc745ca47f2@i2pn2.org> References: <vqrbtd$1chb7$2@solani.org> <vr1hig$5qt$1@news.muc.de> <vr29g3$23fi7$3@dont-email.me> <vr2d3k$jli$1@news.muc.de> <vr3fbu$1gbs1$3@solani.org> <vr3pvd$20r1$1@news.muc.de> <vr4cgl$3qbcs$3@dont-email.me> <vr6fgl$1uok$1@news.muc.de> <vr6tit$21dt9$1@dont-email.me> <vr71ea$qjf$1@news.muc.de> <vr774e$2a6rj$2@dont-email.me> <vr7b30$qjf$2@news.muc.de> <vr7jql$2jj8r$4@dont-email.me> <vr92l8$1pc1$1@news.muc.de> <vr9gla$bvhh$1@dont-email.me> <vrbn3b$2d16$1@news.muc.de> <vrc3ps$2og7j$1@dont-email.me> <vrc64d$219n$1@news.muc.de> <vrc70k$2og7j$5@dont-email.me> <d7b52b84106c40422c61dd52c60177d859a2f701@i2pn2.org> <vrebc5$pg11$2@dont-email.me> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2025 14:15:48 -0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: i2pn2.org; logging-data="822630"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org"; posting-account="nS1KMHaUuWOnF/ukOJzx6Ssd8y16q9UPs1GZ+I3D0CM"; User-Agent: Pan/0.145 (Duplicitous mercenary valetism; d7e168a git.gnome.org/pan2) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0 Bytes: 2357 Lines: 24 Am Wed, 19 Mar 2025 12:55:49 +0100 schrieb WM: > On 18.03.2025 21:52, joes wrote: >> Am Tue, 18 Mar 2025 17:29:08 +0100 schrieb WM: >>>> You're the one who's lacking a degree in maths, >>> No. >> Headline please? Or do you not have a maths degree? >>> Now imagine all FISONs. None empties ℕ when applied one after the >>> other. >> Hold on. No single one or no FISON of them? > No single FISON. The union of *all* FISONs (which is an infinite set and not a FISON of FISONs) however "empties" N. >>> Could that change when all are applied together? >> Yup. Why shouldn't it? > Obviously the subtraction of the set of all FISONs which as single > FISONs cannot empty ℕ cannot empty ℕ. Wrong and not an answer to my question. -- Am Sat, 20 Jul 2024 12:35:31 +0000 schrieb WM in sci.math: It is not guaranteed that n+1 exists for every n.