Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!i2pn.org!rocksolid2!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: hertz778@gmail.com (rhertz)
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Subject: Re: The HOAX of the neutrino invention. After 95 years don't know shit.
Date: Sun, 6 Apr 2025 16:12:10 +0000
Organization: novaBBS
Message-ID: <792e93e53de65294b8b27c6bbd9e3e33@www.novabbs.com>
References: <0dd990630edbc9332716605722eb087a@www.novabbs.com> <137de285af1075fd38879770e4639130@www.novabbs.com> <e3a7231ccaeda2a33dcba756f18dd831@www.novabbs.com> <6574ed55bab2a34e1954de7883b13e3e@www.novabbs.com> <vspbsu$91m3$1@dont-email.me> <98bbe12b3dc453953454c3cabe00bd9f@www.novabbs.com> <8673251dcbfa63f7a079393a4dc91de9@www.novabbs.com> <dbbd624dcd0896666688991107a07628@www.novabbs.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Info: i2pn2.org;
	logging-data="3398003"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org";
	posting-account="OjDMvaaXMeeN/7kNOPQl+dWI+zbnIp3mGAHMVhZ2e/A";
User-Agent: Rocksolid Light
X-Rslight-Site: $2y$10$YzVjtHNcf3bOT9xab5bGyO5pujmCQWLDwkx0WpEWLuc0t.K/qLIGW
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0
X-Rslight-Posting-User: 26080b4f8b9f153eb24ebbc1b47c4c36ee247939
Bytes: 3841
Lines: 64

QUOTING GARNAHELL:


> all what you say is that a High School differential equation solve this?

I said a simple DE, but, of course, I exaggerated for the sake of
promoting discussion.  After all the disingenuous BS about unsolvable
details and deprecating assaults, you finally get to the crux, but then
you don't attack the obvious result: Energy out = Energy in.  If not, we
would eventually either freeze or roast.

And CoE is KNOWN to be valid by engineers.  I spent part of my career
dealing with the problem of keeping laser diodes from overheating and
I can tell you that Electrical power in = [light power + heat power]
out.
It's not necessary to go into the quantum mechanics, solid state
physics,
population inversion, or stimulated emission or optical reflection at
facets or anything else.  If you disagree with that, then you are:

> more stupid than what I thought once. An idiot without cure.

Now THAT I can agree with :-))


******************************************************************

I respect your experience with laser diodes. It's OK, but this is A
LOCAL THING IN AN OPEN SYSTEM!

I question the validity of the "Law of Conservation of Energy" ONLY IN
ABSOLUTELY CLOSED, ISOLATED SYSTEMS, WITH EVERYTHING THAT EXISTS BEING
INTO THE MODEL.

CONTEMPLATE EVERYTHING IN YOUR LOCAL SYSTEM, UNTIL NOTHING IS LEFT OUT!

Then tell me that LCE is a real thing. Some aspects that you missed:

- From where does the energy powering the laser diode? Describe the
chain of
  mechanisms that provide such power, until NOTHING IS LEFT OUT.

- To where are going the energy of the laser beam and the generated heat
going?
  Include every single subsystem IN THE CLOSED SYSTEM that gather the
generated
  energy, up to the last molecule, atom, electron.

Once you included everything, even quantum events, in your model THEN
YOU CAN TALK
ABOUT A CLOSED SYSTEM, AND DO THE MATH TO PROVE THE LCE AS CORRECT-

Too complex for you? OF COURSE, as it is for everyone else.

Then, TO SIMPLIFY, you start to let things OUT OF YOUR CLOSED SYSTEM.
Then, with a little help of arithmetic you can claim: ENERGY IS
CONSERVED, YEAH! (But with which error margin? 0.1%, 0.001%, 0.0000001%?

Do you see? THINK CRITICALLY and then you'll question even the simplest
law, like the Ohm Law.

Got it?  Physics IS A FARCE. Only applied engineering can save the faces
of retarded physicists, highly self-entitled imbeciles.

Why do you accept things without DEEP QUESTIONING THEM?