Path: news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!i2pn.org!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: clzb93ynxj@att.net (LaurenceClarkCrossen)
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Subject: Re: Albert in Relativityland
Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2025 19:28:52 +0000
Organization: novaBBS
Message-ID: <795a3195162645246d7e9e786d2036ff@www.novabbs.com>
References: <3ce0bf632f46843f8cc0a3f45fdc0acd@www.novabbs.com> <vshcgq$3ojsg$3@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Info: i2pn2.org;
	logging-data="2715386"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org";
	posting-account="HcQFdl4zp4UQRQ9N18ivMn6Fl9V8n4SPkK4oZHLgYdQ";
User-Agent: Rocksolid Light
X-Rslight-Posting-User: a2f761a7401f13abeefca3440f16b2f27b708180
X-Rslight-Site: $2y$10$HgFcx1UToRxC6ZXUtrhyc.wo8DszRYowV4GNtR7zmVvjYIRQ9yKl2
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0

On Tue, 1 Apr 2025 18:54:42 +0000, Paul.B.Andersen wrote:

> Den 31.03.2025 22:44, skrev LaurenceClarkCrossen:
>> Here is a good review of some critiques of relativity.
>>
>> "A critical introduction to “Einstein‟s theory of relativity”
>>
>> "written by a non-scientist for other non-scientists who have some
>> intellectual curiosity about this famous theory, with pictures in it and
>> 140 references and citations to authority. 30 pages."
>> by Raleigh Amesbury
>
> Written for non scientist who understand nothing of any theory
> of physics, and thus believe they are qualified to make
> the following sharp analysis of SR and GR.
>
> Laurence, it is written for you!
>
>>
>> "“Einstein‟s theory of relativity” is substantially science fiction,
>> fantasy or philosophy, and represents the worst of science: how science
>> can become political, how political factors can affect funding, how
>> funding can affect scientists‟ jobs and careers, how experimental data
>> can be manipulated to serve as propaganda, and how theory can be
>> presented as fact.
>> Scientific theories come and go. It is about time “Einstein‟s theory of
>> relativity” went.
>> .. The day will come when nobody even mentions either of them anymore.
>> Physicists need only scrap the erroneous hypotheses of length
>> contraction, time dilation, mass distortion, the c speed limit,
>> space-time and curved space, and science will be reasonable and back on
>> track again."
>
Relativity is so fallacious that a person with only knowledge of
elementary logic and an 85 I.Q. is qualified to refute it. It is only
prestigious due to PR. You are making an ad hominem attack because you
are failing to reason. You have continued to fail to give the cause of
the time dilation in the absence of different speeds.