Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!news.nk.ca!rocksolid2!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: clzb93ynxj@att.net (LaurenceClarkCrossen)
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Subject: Re: General Relativity Does Not Rescue Special Relativity.
Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2024 21:26:33 +0000
Organization: novaBBS
Message-ID: <797ace0c06202d7eda70828ad43931b4@www.novabbs.com>
References: <aecb6e4bd2b86ebc457767da8cc40c02@www.novabbs.com> <vkPYO.4701732$1pff.4574957@fx05.ams4> <51913df2deed4fbbc7eb95fb07397186@www.novabbs.com> <S46ZO.4715827$1pff.310997@fx05.ams4> <2ae5e43140f7d9b3407008eea993c4ba@www.novabbs.com> <1RkZO.2$Dhn6.1@fx16.ams4> <102e4878439c34ae8e7ae09082128eb3@www.novabbs.com> <PUMZO.18404$xDBd.14808@fx13.ams4>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Info: i2pn2.org;
	logging-data="2638163"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org";
	posting-account="HcQFdl4zp4UQRQ9N18ivMn6Fl9V8n4SPkK4oZHLgYdQ";
User-Agent: Rocksolid Light
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0
X-Rslight-Posting-User: a2f761a7401f13abeefca3440f16b2f27b708180
X-Rslight-Site: $2y$10$3DzgRrrpohFBdOcmlUPxceOtNwIZSMTshJBxjy257FPokk3W0KxDe
Bytes: 2104
Lines: 17

Paul: I'm sorry you cannot understand such a simple matter. My answers
were straightforward and to the point. Please try to understand.

"How do you measure time?" All methods have weaknesses. Try to consider
them.

Anyone can understand that every method of time reckoning, including
every type of clock, is imperfect for various reasons, and the accuracy
issue is only one. A clock can be precise yet thrown off when nothing
else is. That's all you need to understand.

Anyone reading my comments can easily understand that if the rate of the
clock changes, that doesn't mean any other rate of change on the
satellite changes. Then, time itself may not have changed. Where is your
evidence that any other rate has changed on the satellite?

That the atomic clocks change with gravity doesn't prove time itself
changes.