Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<79JoZp5bHCH4hf4J9cxbLGeMvPE@jntp> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!3.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!proxad.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!usenet-fr.net!pasdenom.info!from-devjntp Message-ID: <79JoZp5bHCH4hf4J9cxbLGeMvPE@jntp> JNTP-Route: news2.nemoweb.net JNTP-DataType: Article Subject: Re: Does the number of nines =?UTF-8?Q?increase=3F?= References: <tJf9P9dALSN4l2XH5vdqPbXSA7o@jntp> <74434c50-c747-4bce-853d-b7f8a9d0ef50@att.net> <-8_ECzK8niPUPiyxStcpsZWzJqA@jntp> <53214031-3ad1-48bd-8584-0720ec5b28dd@att.net> <bsFBaEx89RCdvkhqBwd1K4mh5ns@jntp> <d98d5c8a-041d-4ce6-b7c8-5a212a7bfa3c@att.net> <e3ZDe1OozyaPv_8HZy_kTDZtHJk@jntp> <v6spao$3diun$2@dont-email.me> <d6yZRpOl38J4dqE-n_qqzplqNmQ@jntp> <v6ul15$3ni5h$1@dont-email.me> Newsgroups: sci.math JNTP-HashClient: 5AO1ktpxMt4SGTqI9Vk58D4BHoE JNTP-ThreadID: 0JbXgoRqYUfKvvWhEBWZVJgnda4 JNTP-Uri: http://news2.nemoweb.net/?DataID=79JoZp5bHCH4hf4J9cxbLGeMvPE@jntp User-Agent: Nemo/0.999a JNTP-OriginServer: news2.nemoweb.net Date: Sun, 14 Jul 24 12:58:53 +0000 Organization: Nemoweb JNTP-Browser: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/126.0.0.0 Safari/537.36 Injection-Info: news2.nemoweb.net; posting-host="82b75c1d0a83e677ff646b52485f72f8b23749df"; logging-data="2024-07-14T12:58:53Z/8947645"; posting-account="217@news2.nemoweb.net"; mail-complaints-to="julien.arlandis@gmail.com" JNTP-ProtocolVersion: 0.21.1 JNTP-Server: PhpNemoServer/0.94.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-JNTP-JsonNewsGateway: 0.96 From: WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> Bytes: 2328 Lines: 24 Le 13/07/2024 à 21:37, Moebius a écrit : > Am 13.07.2024 um 17:56 schrieb WM: >> Le 13/07/2024 à 04:38, Moebius a écrit : >>> Am 12.07.2024 um 19:29 schrieb WM: >>> > Le 10/07/2024 à 19:58, Jim Burns a écrit : >> >>> >> When you say that >>> >> NUF(x) doesn't changeᵂᴹ at 0 >>> >> you mean that >>> > >>> > it does not change its value from x < 0, namely NUF(0) = 0. >>> >>> But it changes its value from aleph_0 for each and every x > 0 to 0 at >>> x = 0, >> >> That claim is wrong, > > Nope. That claim is wrong, easily disproved by the fact, that ℵo unit fractions cannot be compressed between [0, oo) and (0, oo). Regards, WM