Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<7RycnbvrTfw00W37nZ2dnZfqnPadnZ2d@giganews.com> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!Xl.tags.giganews.com!local-2.nntp.ord.giganews.com!news.giganews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 22 Sep 2024 16:58:17 +0000 Subject: Re: E. Noether contra B. Carter Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity References: <bf9ca72acb304865dcc1c4054f751c82@www.novabbs.com> <66EBD36E.681A@ix.netcom.com> <7d8182bc45020d55aab445a4cc174be5@www.novabbs.com> <66ECF6A7.2040@ix.netcom.com> <66EE6153.30B5@ix.netcom.com> <a0471517e47f3b15422996f86e638a0f@www.novabbs.com> From: Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> Date: Sun, 22 Sep 2024 09:58:20 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <a0471517e47f3b15422996f86e638a0f@www.novabbs.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <7RycnbvrTfw00W37nZ2dnZfqnPadnZ2d@giganews.com> Lines: 110 X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com X-Trace: sv3-gSh9BFcTxtpLE4W08jXrfCLURob2K6CxtErgvj0FRDaObQt1jnZ4InV0iTdLkAH1kYRsGp7MiR/cj6R!/xCfW2Lwy7P/S8LjoN6oHQRASqHVRg5DtQxTtaeDRFXsLorSQmBLLd6PBEHEUlZSGXlhoHzNCgJo!xQ== X-Complaints-To: abuse@giganews.com X-DMCA-Notifications: http://www.giganews.com/info/dmca.html X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly X-Postfilter: 1.3.40 Bytes: 4934 On 09/22/2024 09:18 AM, JanPB wrote: > On Sat, 21 Sep 2024 6:01:55 +0000, The Starmaker wrote: > >> The Starmaker wrote: >>> >>> JanPB wrote: >>>> >>>> On Thu, 19 Sep 2024 7:31:58 +0000, The Starmaker wrote: >>>> >>>> > JanPB wrote: >>>> >> >>>> [...] >>>> > >>>> > Your math is correct but doesn't seem to have any meaning. >>>> >>>> No geometric meaning (which I was hoping for). >>> >>> i see, you have your own approach to doings things no one else does.. >> >>> Also the P isn't standard and needs more clarification >> >> K = < r^2 gamma' - rho^2 P(gamma') , gamma' > > > OK, fair point. Surprisingly perhaps, the Kerr spacetime has > an orthogonal moving frame almost everywhere (away from the > usual suspects like the singular set and the horizons): > > e0 = (r^2 + a^2)@/@t + a @/@phi > e1 = @/@r > e2 = @/@theta > e3 = a sin^2(theta) @/@t + @/@phi > > e2 and e3 are always spacelike while e0, e1 are always of > the opposite causal character, so e0 and e1 span a > Minkowski signature plane, called the principal plane. > > The P I used above denotes the orthogonal projection onto > that plane. > > BTW, a geodesic is called principal if its tangent vector > lies in the principal plane. > > EXERCISE. Let gamma be a timelike geodesic. Then: > K = 0 if and only if gamma is a principal in > the equatorial plane (theta = pi/2). > >> further more, there are too many errors for me to list them all... > > There are no errors. > >> you finally reached ...kooksville. > > Talk is cheap. > > -- > Jan Seems you're trying to figure out "spaghettification" vis-a-vis "suckage". One such notion is that of "cube wall". This is that on one side of the boundary, the horizon, it's cubic, and space terms, on the other side gradient, and down. Then it seems you leave one term out to skate while building up what first would have to be a "square wall", with regards to the plane tangent the horizon. Instead it's sort of that they each scale down, from cube to wall. The jets that usually result of course are exactly anti-podal what gets input. So anyways what that begins to address is that in the very small or otherwise the very extreme, that units start exchanging, like mass and length. Now these are matters of projection then as well about singularities, so most coat-tailing paper-hangers either pick a normal partial thats deemed to fall out, blow up the number of dimensions, or assign non-real interpretations to the values like negative time, advised as they are that the success of something like Clebsch-Gordon like what you got there, in other situations of "what's squoze", functional freedom, or various inversions in the space. Instead there's like that in the Planck-ian, or, at the horizon, is what gets into some pretty simple notions geometrically, of this "cube wall", and, "cube spiral". Now, this involves geometry in the infinitesimal or as with regards to "infinite shear" and these kinds of things, so, anyways what you got there "what's squoze makes something flattened" instead of "what's squoze is squoze", has that usual models that result spaghettification after usual models of what's suckage, either just say that your patty-cakes can have examples in the sky survey found where it looks so, and examples in the sky survey where it don't. So, you need something like a "cube wall" and "cube spiral", what you got there is a "patty-cakes".