Path: nntp.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!i2pn.org!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: joes <noreply@example.org>
Newsgroups: sci.logic
Subject: Re: Simple enough for every reader?
Date: Fri, 4 Jul 2025 12:55:43 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: i2pn2 (i2pn.org)
Message-ID: <7a12e3e08cb3aaaa5653a4ff52386b64f7a76e77@i2pn2.org>
References: <100a8ah$ekoh$1@dont-email.me> <102u1gk$32100$1@dont-email.me>
	<102ug2t$35ekh$1@dont-email.me> <1030dft$3obvv$1@dont-email.me>
	<10315us$3tqn8$2@dont-email.me> <1033805$lvet$1@dont-email.me>
	<1033ks9$1075$1@dont-email.me> <10360hf$10lrl$1@dont-email.me>
	<10365va$11afj$3@dont-email.me> <1038it5$epe7$1@dont-email.me>
	<1039873$jtod$1@dont-email.me> <103b13q$14dr9$1@dont-email.me>
	<103bc1r$17360$2@dont-email.me> <103dqb3$1u2kv$1@dont-email.me>
	<103engv$25bv0$1@dont-email.me> <103g9t2$2l4am$1@dont-email.me>
	<103hkv3$2voqr$1@dont-email.me> <103j7qu$3dl3j$1@dont-email.me>
	<103jgq9$3fje0$1@dont-email.me> <103lhgp$11qu$1@dont-email.me>
	<103mrsa$b011$1@dont-email.me> <103oe8v$ppfi$1@dont-email.me>
	<103osb9$sphe$1@dont-email.me> <103r4a7$1fl13$1@dont-email.me>
	<103ukik$2ahp0$1@dont-email.me> <1042o2k$3d5cj$1@dont-email.me>
	<1043dg5$3hor7$1@dont-email.me> <1045itl$3le8$1@dont-email.me>
	<1045vc8$5pd6$1@dont-email.me> <1048164$ndss$1@dont-email.me>
	<1048hlm$qhhe$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Fri, 4 Jul 2025 12:55:43 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: i2pn2.org;
	logging-data="3321465"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org";
	posting-account="nS1KMHaUuWOnF/ukOJzx6Ssd8y16q9UPs1GZ+I3D0CM";
User-Agent: Pan/0.145 (Duplicitous mercenary valetism; d7e168a
 git.gnome.org/pan2)
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0

Am Fri, 04 Jul 2025 14:32:55 +0200 schrieb WM:
> On 04.07.2025 09:51, Mikko wrote:
>> On 2025-07-03 13:08:25 +0000, WM said:

>>> Cantor's beliefs have induced a large filed of mathematics.
>> Only becase he could support his beliefs with proofs.
> There is no proof of an actual infinity. How should that work?
Dunno, what do you want?

>> Mathematicians don't care about beliefs but they do care about proofs.
> His "proofs" contradict mathematics, according to which in every
> interval (0, n] and i the limit there are twice as many natural nu8mbers
> as eve numbers. Every correct counting method must confirm this result.
And it does! Twice infinite is just infinite again. No contradiction.

-- 
Am Sat, 20 Jul 2024 12:35:31 +0000 schrieb WM in sci.math:
It is not guaranteed that n+1 exists for every n.