Path: ...!news.misty.com!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!i2pn.org!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: mitchalsup@aol.com (MitchAlsup1)
Newsgroups: comp.arch
Subject: Re: YASV (Yet Another Security Vulnearability)
Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2024 00:37:01 +0000
Organization: Rocksolid Light
Message-ID: <7adf3c0243ad1f0ce044b33fe3885a2e@www.novabbs.org>
References: <v7rqbf$1ta84$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Info: i2pn2.org;
	logging-data="253281"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org";
	posting-account="65wTazMNTleAJDh/pRqmKE7ADni/0wesT78+pyiDW8A";
User-Agent: Rocksolid Light
X-Rslight-Site: $2y$10$EXbFZ8.BIKbsGXxug2u.CeyZX34V7RfpQ7BzuaHDJ8B4kFjBExHhC
X-Rslight-Posting-User: ac58ceb75ea22753186dae54d967fed894c3dce8
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0
Bytes: 1296
Lines: 11

On Wed, 24 Jul 2024 21:05:51 +0000, Thomas Koenig wrote:

> This time, it's "Indirector".
>
> https://thehackernews.com/2024/07/new-intel-cpu-vulnerability-indirector.html
>
> The same article also mentions that ARM have their own issue
> with the Memory Tagging Extension.

Another attack My 66000 is not sensitive to.

{{The Simpson's Nelson:: "Ha Ha"}}