| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<7c1a821f405da0e18baa4aa28740321180a94a27@i2pn2.org> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!i2pn.org!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> Newsgroups: sci.logic,sci.math Subject: Re: Replacement of Cardinality Date: Sun, 4 Aug 2024 15:18:48 -0400 Organization: i2pn2 (i2pn.org) Message-ID: <7c1a821f405da0e18baa4aa28740321180a94a27@i2pn2.org> References: <hsRF8g6ZiIZRPFaWbZaL2jR1IiU@jntp> <411a6d693f5dac5ec7cf51a239a9570ac5ce7bd4@i2pn2.org> <9ynqddb0aIxRIgzLd8YZuWqFJQQ@jntp> <e12da78fd53e95ae8b54c4b0f100c10542acfa1a@i2pn2.org> <-e7H52W39rR5zxvT-LWQK-OpG5Y@jntp> <e7f793fb1fd82c90442679bfbcd2a334f10b7b13@i2pn2.org> <l90BjXTiETgjHOXXIVlMxb7MmW4@jntp> <1b5b8ca644d046287b98425370d9b63969f29b77@i2pn2.org> <sYsymRdUNsX2SjE7Q9zBfxLaMTA@jntp> <1ade977eb8eed80127f168342031db7515e61917@i2pn2.org> <ChXul2C6E8Q4fDOGO50gDzmwrU0@jntp> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Sun, 4 Aug 2024 19:18:48 -0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: i2pn2.org; logging-data="1459494"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org"; posting-account="diqKR1lalukngNWEqoq9/uFtbkm5U+w3w6FQ0yesrXg"; User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0 In-Reply-To: <ChXul2C6E8Q4fDOGO50gDzmwrU0@jntp> Content-Language: en-US Bytes: 1945 Lines: 24 On 8/4/24 11:23 AM, WM wrote: > Le 03/08/2024 à 17:56, Richard Damon a écrit : >> On 8/3/24 10:30 AM, WM wrote: > >>> But there is not even an eps that separates half of all unit fractions. >> >> Because such a question is meaningles, as there isn't a finite number >> that is half of the count of unit fractions. > > If there are all, then there is half of all. Not with infinities. Sorry, your logic just breaks with unbounded sets. That is the problem of using the wrong tools, they tend to just blow up on you. > > Regards, WM > >