Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<7c5ba657292ffe956b0dc7e1fb9ac565836b4758@i2pn2.org> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!i2pn.org!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> Newsgroups: comp.theory Subject: Re: Self-Modifying Turing Machine Date: Sat, 20 Jul 2024 09:53:24 -0400 Organization: i2pn2 (i2pn.org) Message-ID: <7c5ba657292ffe956b0dc7e1fb9ac565836b4758@i2pn2.org> References: <v6un9t$3nufp$1@dont-email.me> <v7013v$2ccv$1@dont-email.me> <v70nt7$61d8$6@dont-email.me> <58fc6559638120b31e128fe97b5e955248afe218@i2pn2.org> <v71mjh$bp3i$1@dont-email.me> <1173a460ee95e0ca82c08abecdefc80ba86646ac@i2pn2.org> <v71okl$bvm2$1@dont-email.me> <5f6daf68f1b4ffac854d239282bc811b5b806659@i2pn2.org> <v71ttb$crk4$1@dont-email.me> <60e7a93cb8cec0afb68b3e40a0e82e9d63fa8e2a@i2pn2.org> <v721po$h4kr$1@dont-email.me> <v73td3$qkp2$6@dont-email.me> <v73tvs$qpi9$1@dont-email.me> <v74n81$13bn1$1@dont-email.me> <fafa57d75cf800c930c76530acd72148c77fff87@i2pn2.org> <v75ul2$19j7l$5@dont-email.me> <v77s2f$1o4oh$1@dont-email.me> <v78gi1$1rc43$6@dont-email.me> <v7d5r0$2t5hr$1@dont-email.me> <v7dsit$30pvh$4@dont-email.me> <v7fucc$3fh57$1@dont-email.me> <v7gcjm$3hlc2$1@dont-email.me> <2c58f962e8efae4d5358494672a22e02e90b4fbb@i2pn2.org> <v7genn$3hlc2$6@dont-email.me> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Sat, 20 Jul 2024 13:53:24 -0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: i2pn2.org; logging-data="3938153"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org"; posting-account="diqKR1lalukngNWEqoq9/uFtbkm5U+w3w6FQ0yesrXg"; User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: <v7genn$3hlc2$6@dont-email.me> X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0 Bytes: 4289 Lines: 57 On 7/20/24 9:40 AM, olcott wrote: > On 7/20/2024 8:24 AM, joes wrote: >> Am Sat, 20 Jul 2024 08:03:50 -0500 schrieb olcott: >>> On 7/20/2024 4:01 AM, Mikko wrote: >>>> On 2024-07-19 14:18:05 +0000, olcott said: >>>>> When a Self-Modifying Turing Machine can change itself to become any >>>>> other Turing Machine then it can eliminate the pathological >>>>> relationship to its input. >>>> It never was a Turing machine. >>> A self modifying TM is merely a TM description that is simulated by a >>> UTM and has access to itself on the UTM tape. >>> This same idea can be implemented as an emulated x86 program that knows >>> its own machine address. Self-modifying code is not a new idea. Applying >>> this to TMs is a new idea. > >> This is your first mention of selfmodification. >> > > *No eight years ago was mu first mention* August 2016 > https://www.researchgate.net/publication/307509556_Self_Modifying_Turing_Machine_SMTM_Solution_to_the_Halting_Problem_concrete_example > > (1) Every TM / input pair either halts or fails to halt. > (2) There exists a TM halt decider for every TM / input pair. > (3) A SMTM can become any element of the set of TMs. > (4) Therefore a SMTM can become a halt decider for any TM input pair. > > A self modifying TM is merely a TM description of a machine that is > simulated by a UTM such that this TM description has access to its > location on the UTM tape. > > It is isomorphic to an x86 program that knows its own machine > address within its x86 emulator. > >>> Everyone here is acting like unconventional new ideas are impossible >>> because they are unconventional and new. >> No, but you can't transfer conventional knowledge unchanged. >> > WHich is just bad logic from someone who doesn't understand what he is talking about. You show your error by making a clear "type error" in your logic. You say a "self modifying TM is ... a TM description", but TMs are NOT their description (as you point out in your deceptive claim that a TM can not take a TM as an input). ALL "self-modifying" programs can be converted to an equivalent version that doesn't use self-modification. Also, yout (2) just shows your ignorance of the problem. OF COURSE we can find a TM that gives the correct answer about a specific TM/input given. We just need to choose between the machine that answers Halting always or non-halting always. The problem is to find ONE program that givens the answer for ALL input.