Path: ...!news.misty.com!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!news.nk.ca!rocksolid2!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: film.art@gmail.com (JanPB)
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Subject: Re: The Shapiro's experiment HOAX. A 1968 TIME article.
Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2024 21:30:59 +0000
Organization: novaBBS
Message-ID: <7e1522d07882d245f4c942b1684b3f15@www.novabbs.com>
References: <db18709b6ba689b9c07245000ff1b094@www.novabbs.com> <EgMPO.1766243$4J12.285784@fx12.ams4>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Info: i2pn2.org;
	logging-data="2496722"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org";
	posting-account="jbf9ODw05erRG5e/iTB5O4FuOiiR328AFAd4frgdrX4";
User-Agent: Rocksolid Light
X-Rslight-Site: $2y$10$c8oGlooZ02Ncwk1.a7l7oOheGufn1jDUkYitR8Z/c5YjwXZLTMnBq
X-Rslight-Posting-User: 41df9b4c39cd8dd5aa85a9827acb9c5529cd7dea
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0
Bytes: 1735
Lines: 23

On Wed, 16 Oct 2024 10:11:13 +0000, Paul B. Andersen wrote:

> Den 14.10.2024 02:43, skrev rhertz:
>>
>> I post the entire article, so you can have a laugh.
[...]
>> https://time.com/archive/6834981/physics-probing-einstein-with-radar/
>>
>
> When you are done laughing, you can read Shapiro's paper.
>
> https://paulba.no/paper/Shapiro_1968.pdf
>
> But since you invariably fail to understand and always misinterpret
> what you read, it probably is no point in trying to read it.

It's weird that those without any capacity for X insist on doing X
(X = physics in this case).

Nothing Richard writes has anything to do with physics.  Instead, it
is some sort of elaborate fantasy a la Tolkien.

--
Jan