Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!news.nk.ca!rocksolid2!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: hitlong@yahoo.com (gharnagel)
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Subject: Re: Electron size, shape and spin.Confusion and conflicts with Einstein's
 1905 SR.
Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2025 18:39:24 +0000
Organization: novaBBS
Message-ID: <7e522a603388b78659c33f089ad2b28f@www.novabbs.com>
References: <8d05bbe123c740f2934b31e367a92231@www.novabbs.com> <65006a73bc196736fbec3d54e21fa717@www.novabbs.com> <vr9tmf$q4vi$1@dont-email.me> <0c0b2bb49434e61879858abed2b9d6c2@www.novabbs.com> <vrbtgj$2k1q7$1@dont-email.me> <a1b3bbfca4b1e9797d98903a77f0cf59@www.novabbs.com> <f58a6ba75e73908078c5576f74ffe329@www.novabbs.com> <9ed9e92086e0d99fde7d81edfced643a@www.novabbs.com> <0082c223a6c8e6952b11ec32b83c473b@www.novabbs.com> <d38ac7fb8de3a1e3c8f08908a6e1953a@www.novabbs.com> <40f0e2c10ed1e2c2d24989b4c7917802@www.novabbs.com> <b216582f371ee9c22456535c6fc58393@www.novabbs.com> <5326ff6557136727edbf584db8abd0e7@www.novabbs.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Info: i2pn2.org;
	logging-data="890101"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org";
	posting-account="TRF929uvrTGZYJLF+N3tVBXNVfr/PeoSjsJ9hd5hWzo";
User-Agent: Rocksolid Light
X-Rslight-Posting-User: cefb4c33981645a229d345bae7bb8942e6b32c35
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0
X-Rslight-Site: $2y$10$YslBM5nKb8JCi0tMupt5W.dD9rLjVbhM9UdooRjy7c85vKp6jHhfW
Bytes: 5870
Lines: 109

On Wed, 19 Mar 2025 16:16:47 +0000, rhertz wrote:
>
> I'll just focus on a couple of things that your "BRAIN" fails to
> distinguish.
>
> 1) In sync means that both Cs clocks start measuring 1 day (86,400 sec)
> by signaling both with an EM beep (could be through an encoded laser
> shot,
> which moves at c speed, you know?).

Oh, how do YOU know they travel at c?  The satellites are MOVING, you
know.  Why would you believe the signal from the satellite travels at
c?

But given that c were constant, then they would use EINSTEIN
synchronization to synchronize the clocks, but the clocks didn't STAY
in sync, which blows your whole argument down.

> 2) I, specifically and with details, wrote that each pulse of both
> master clocks at 10.23 Mhz HAS TO BE ACCUMULATED IN 12 DIGIT COUNTERS!
> Hard to understand for you?.

Is it hard for you to understand that the signal from the clock in orbit
was received at 10.23+ MHz, which means that the onboard counters
accumulated MORE counts than the one on the ground?  And that all your
detailed gyrations are irrelevant?

> Once the lapse is finished, the GPS satellite TRANSMIT CODIFIED
> INFORMATION OF ITS 12 DIGIT COUNTER, while at the same time the Earth's
> counter information is stored for comparison.

And the satellite counter accumulated more counts than the earth
counter.

> THE FREQUENCY OF THE CARRIER THAT TRANSMIT THE DATA IS IRRELEVANT,
> BECAUSE ONLY THE TRANSMITTED INFORMATION IS WHAT IS WORTH.

So how did the satellite counter accumulate more counts than the earth
counter, rocket boy?

> 3) The general Schwarzschild solution (the only one used by retarded
> relativists) CAN'T PROVIDE SEPARATE RESULTS FOR SR AND GR. Because of
> that,

Look, mathematically-incompetent gasbag:

dTau^2/dt^2 = 1 - 2GM/(Rc^2) - v^2/c^2

where v is the orbital velocity (I've left out radial velocity effects).

There you see the gravitational part and the velocity part all nicely
and neatly packaged in the same equation, easily separated by anyone
to see with a brain not snipped of its neurons.

> the result IS SPLIT in two parts (GR delay and SR delay). GR result is a
> function ONLY of the average height of the satellite, assuming circular
> orbits.

Completely demented falsehood.

> BUT, the SR result IS FALSE/FALLACIOUS, because the motion of the
> satellite IS NOT INERTIAL. It contains a component of acceleration due
> to its elliptic orbit.

Doubling down on incompetent stupidity, I see.

> THEREFORE, the 7 usec that result from the SR part are completely FALSE
> and don't verify the domain of applicability of the 1905 SR CRAP!

That's a very ignorant assertion.  The v is the equation above is
derived from R*dTheta/dt in the Schw. metric, so it's not "recti-
linear at all.  This is borne out in accelerator experiments where
radioactive particles traveling around in circles experience time
dilated decays.  SR works!  So does GR.

Stupid, stupid young padawan learner who refuses to acknowledge the
wisdom of the Jedi.

> Do you understand now, imbecile? (sorry for the profanity, but it
> suits).

Well, that's the suit YOU wear when you double down on your ignorance.

> I can't explain it better than that for a "human" being. My dog,
> sitting by me, is approving the explanation. A fucking (sorry) dog
> digs it, but you can't?

If you believe a dog understands how to count 10.3 MHz pulses, then
you're stupider than even I thought.

> Go out to make gardening with Paul. You are way to indoctrinated to
> think openly and clearly. YOU ARE A FUCKING (sorry) MENTAL SLAVE OF THE
> CULT'S NARRATIVE, like Paul is.

Pot, kettle, black.  You'll never be a physicist at this rate.

> I'm not. I don't give a fuck about EVERYTHING WRITTEN AND PUBLISHED in
> the last 100 years. I read, REASON FREELY and then adopt a position
> without BIASES OF ANY KIND.

You're not into self-criticism, are you.  So you believe that YOU don't
have biases?  You are WAY stupider than I thought.

> You could try to think freely too.

I do, just ask PCH.  But at least I draw the limit at what may be rather
than what is complete fantasy.

“The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its
limits” -- Albert Einstein