Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.quux.org!news.nk.ca!rocksolid2!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org>
Newsgroups: comp.theory,comp.lang.c,comp.lang.c++
Subject: Re: DD correctly emulated by HHH --- Totally ignoring invalid
 rebuttals
Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2025 07:30:00 -0500
Organization: i2pn2 (i2pn.org)
Message-ID: <7e8714d2ee8666325eeb2005527835fe5dc4dfca@i2pn2.org>
References: <vq5qqc$1j128$2@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2025 12:30:01 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: i2pn2.org;
	logging-data="2797577"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org";
	posting-account="diqKR1lalukngNWEqoq9/uFtbkm5U+w3w6FQ0yesrXg";
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
In-Reply-To: <vq5qqc$1j128$2@dont-email.me>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0
Content-Language: en-US
Bytes: 3212
Lines: 59

No, your are just totally ignoring the ERRORS and LIES pointed out in 
your arguement, because you just don't care about what is true, but are 
just a pathological liar with a reckess


On 3/3/25 10:07 PM, olcott wrote:
> int DD()
> {
>    int Halt_Status = HHH(DD);
>    if (Halt_Status)
>      HERE: goto HERE;
>    return Halt_Status;
> }
> 
> _DD()
> [00002133] 55         push ebp      ; housekeeping
> [00002134] 8bec       mov ebp,esp   ; housekeeping
> [00002136] 51         push ecx      ; make space for local
> [00002137] 6833210000 push 00002133 ; push DD
> [0000213c] e882f4ffff call 000015c3 ; call HHH(DD)
> [00002141] 83c404     add esp,+04
> [00002144] 8945fc     mov [ebp-04],eax
> [00002147] 837dfc00   cmp dword [ebp-04],+00
> [0000214b] 7402       jz 0000214f
> [0000214d] ebfe       jmp 0000214d
> [0000214f] 8b45fc     mov eax,[ebp-04]
> [00002152] 8be5       mov esp,ebp
> [00002154] 5d         pop ebp
> [00002155] c3         ret
> Size in bytes:(0035) [00002155]
> 
> DD correctly emulated by HHH cannot possibly
> reach its own "ret" instruction and terminate normally.

And that DD can not be "correctly emualted" by HHH, as it isn't a 
complete program.

When you include HHH in that code, we first find that you currect design 
of HHH doesn't "correctly emulate" its input, but aborts it based on a 
false assumption about what the input does.

And, if we change HHH to meet that specification, YOU have proven that 
it will not answer, and thus not be a decider.

The problem is you don't understand the question your HHH is supposed to 
be answering, but have replaced it with a strawman, and apparently you 
have straw for your brain.

> 
> The only valid rebuttal is to show all of the steps of
> exactly how DD correctly emulated by HHH reaches its
> own "ret" instruction.
> 

Nope, YOU need to show that you understand the errors you dismissed.

All you are doing is proving that you are just a ignorant pathological 
lying idiot with a reckless disregard for the truth,

That will be how you are remembered for eternity,