Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!news.nk.ca!rocksolid2!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: joes <noreply@example.org>
Newsgroups: comp.theory
Subject: Re: The philosophy of computation reformulates existing ideas on a
 new basis ---
Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2024 07:55:24 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: i2pn2 (i2pn.org)
Message-ID: <7ec19c29b77b7de35568e603323116f7e8dc4f48@i2pn2.org>
References: <vfli1h$fj8s$1@dont-email.me> <vfpbtq$1837o$2@dont-email.me>
	<vfq4h9$1fo1n$1@dont-email.me> <vfqpi3$1iaob$4@dont-email.me>
	<vfqsng$1gikg$1@dont-email.me> <vfsadf$1urkc$1@dont-email.me>
	<vft4kp$23a0h$1@dont-email.me> <vfvo2o$2ln20$1@dont-email.me>
	<vg09p2$2kq69$1@dont-email.me> <vg0a9h$2op6r$1@dont-email.me>
	<fd8bf90393a5bcb10f7913da9081421637262590@i2pn2.org>
	<vg14nd$2t4b1$1@dont-email.me> <SGUUO.312650$kxD8.126005@fx11.iad>
	<vg16dl$2th77$1@dont-email.me> <vg2b6j$374jn$1@dont-email.me>
	<vg2gg1$37lpn$5@dont-email.me> <vg4onc$3ngof$1@dont-email.me>
	<vg4uem$3o3ca$1@dont-email.me> <vg7f7l$a1jf$1@dont-email.me>
	<vg7t8h$c823$4@dont-email.me>
	<psydnYHRoboAJbr6nZ2dnZfqn_SdnZ2d@brightview.co.uk>
	<vg8djc$fg4n$1@dont-email.me>
	<6d8148432a7183c5f16c2f5b3b549fb6b3edc390@i2pn2.org>
	<vg8g2v$fg4n$3@dont-email.me>
	<47203deb6a279dab5cec175ebe146df4af82c672@i2pn2.org>
	<vg8prq$hsfu$1@dont-email.me>
	<bd0e11185c0c5bfa28dccf35e640fa4ce195aff9@i2pn2.org>
	<vg8tp4$i9jj$3@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2024 07:55:24 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: i2pn2.org;
	logging-data="867809"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org";
	posting-account="nS1KMHaUuWOnF/ukOJzx6Ssd8y16q9UPs1GZ+I3D0CM";
User-Agent: Pan/0.145 (Duplicitous mercenary valetism; d7e168a
 git.gnome.org/pan2)
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0
Bytes: 4083
Lines: 49

Am Sun, 03 Nov 2024 16:34:12 -0600 schrieb olcott:
> On 11/3/2024 4:17 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
>> On 11/3/24 4:27 PM, olcott wrote:
>>> On 11/3/2024 3:14 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
>>>> On 11/3/24 1:40 PM, olcott wrote:
>>>>> On 11/3/2024 12:22 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
>>>>>> On 11/3/24 12:58 PM, olcott wrote:
>>>>>>> On 11/3/2024 11:53 AM, Mike Terry wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 03/11/2024 13:19, olcott wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 11/3/2024 3:19 AM, Mikko wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On 2024-11-02 10:21:09 +0000, Andy Walker said:

>>>>>>>>> The term "lie" is to only be applied to intentionally deceitful
>>>>>>>>> statements. To apply the term "lie" to statements not having
>>>>>>>>> intentional deceit <is> itself intentional deceit.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Not if the person making that claim sincerely believes it. :)
>>>>>>>> You are being inconsistent here...
hehe :)

>>>>>>> Richard has said that he does not mean intentional deceit when he
>>>>>>> calls me a liar, yet uses the term "liar" anyway knowing that
>>>>>>> others will take this to mean intentional deceit. So Richard is a
>>>>>>> liar for calling me a liar.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> Because the word doesn't just mean intential deciet.
>>>>>> And you are an intentional liar to say it only means that, as you
>>>>>> have been shown the definition.
>>>>>>
>>>>> Unless you always qualify you use of the term "liar" as
>>>>> {unintentional falsity} it is the kind of defamation suit that you
>>>>> will lose because the communication process always assumes the
>>>>> primary meaning of a term unless otherwise specified.
>>>>
>>>> Nope, I guess you learned your law just as good as your logic,
>>>> Since a "reasonable" person will undetstand that statements that are
>>>> clearly false under the standard mean can be considered to be lies.
>>>
>>> *That not the way it works bro. Don't bet your house on that*
>> 
>> Would YOU bet your savings on it?
>> 
> Yes. I don't have much life left so yes.
Liar.
> *This is my official cease-and-desist notification*
> STOP CALLING ME A LIAR !!!

-- 
Am Sat, 20 Jul 2024 12:35:31 +0000 schrieb WM in sci.math:
It is not guaranteed that n+1 exists for every n.