Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!i2pn.org!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org>
Newsgroups: comp.theory
Subject: Re: DDD correctly emulated by HHH cannot possibly halt, thinks
 olcott, but it does.
Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2024 20:37:58 -0400
Organization: i2pn2 (i2pn.org)
Message-ID: <7f9b731b2367a2bcf2883278ee5265d30a8f82d6@i2pn2.org>
References: <v6e7va$c4sv$1@dont-email.me> <v6g444$pdc2$1@dont-email.me>
 <v6go4d$sg7f$1@dont-email.me> <v6ikv5$19h6q$1@dont-email.me>
 <v6jguf$1ctoi$5@dont-email.me> <v6ji1d$1dpoc$1@dont-email.me>
 <v6jig0$1ctoi$11@dont-email.me> <v6jkib$1e3jq$1@dont-email.me>
 <v6jpe5$1eul0$1@dont-email.me> <v6jpqo$1e3jq$2@dont-email.me>
 <v6jqfg$1eul0$2@dont-email.me> <v6k6md$1h3a7$1@dont-email.me>
 <v6k9ef$1hicb$1@dont-email.me>
 <04b97cd4a405abead92368522fcf77070bb4fa55@i2pn2.org>
 <v6l24d$1oqjv$1@dont-email.me>
 <a267bfdf93c6fc179d09a3f62f25003f033aaff1@i2pn2.org>
 <v6m331$1tj30$7@dont-email.me>
 <6d43f24547a3b170ce6f7a99e30ec60dec589f79@i2pn2.org>
 <v6n8ob$24dmg$3@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2024 00:37:58 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: i2pn2.org;
	logging-data="2844747"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org";
	posting-account="diqKR1lalukngNWEqoq9/uFtbkm5U+w3w6FQ0yesrXg";
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
In-Reply-To: <v6n8ob$24dmg$3@dont-email.me>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0
Content-Language: en-US
Bytes: 13656
Lines: 312

On 7/10/24 8:24 PM, olcott wrote:
> On 7/10/2024 7:01 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
>> On 7/10/24 9:41 AM, olcott wrote:
>>> On 7/10/2024 8:27 AM, joes wrote:
>>>> Am Tue, 09 Jul 2024 23:19:25 -0500 schrieb olcott:
>>>>> On 7/9/2024 11:01 PM, joes wrote:
>>>>>   > That means that HHH doesn't return, in particular that it doesn't
>>>>>   > abort.
>>>>> DDD correctly emulated by any pure function HHH that correctly 
>>>>> emulates
>>>>> 1 to ∞ steps of DDD can't make it past the above line of code no 
>>>>> matter
>>>>> what.
>>>> That line being the call to itself -> it can't simulate itself.
>>>>
>>>>> *DDD NEVER HALTS*
>>>> DDD ONLY calls HHH...
>>>>
>>>
>>> void DDD()
>>> {
>>>    HHH(DDD);
>>>    return;
>>> }
>>>
>>> DDD correctly emulated by any pure function HHH that
>>> correctly emulates 1 to ∞ lines of DDD can't make it
>>> to the second line of DDD no matter what.
>>>
>>>
>>
>> Nope, DDD does if HHH(DDD) returns.
>>
> 
> You have a dead cat in your driveway does not mean that
> you have a peanut butter sandwich on your front porch.
> It has taken you at least 1000 messages to see that.
> 
> DDD correctly emulated by any pure function HHH that
> correctly emulates 1 to ∞ lines of DDD can't make it
> to the second line of DDD no matter what.

WRONG, you don't seem to understand the difference between DDD and HHH's 
emualtion of it.


DDD just runs to its end when you run it, or correctly emulate it (which 
HHH doesn't do since it aborts its emulation).

HHH only partially emulates its input and sees only part of the 
behavior, and then guess wrongly.

That you don't understand this shows you have major issues with the 
difference between reality and simulated reality.

> 
> DDD correctly emulated by any pure function HHH that
> correctly emulates 1 to ∞ lines of DDD can't make it
> to the second line of DDD no matter what.
> 
> DDD correctly emulated by any pure function HHH that
> correctly emulates 1 to ∞ lines of DDD can't make it
> to the second line of DDD no matter what.
> 
> DDD correctly emulated by any pure function HHH that
> correctly emulates 1 to ∞ lines of DDD can't make it
> to the second line of DDD no matter what.
> 
> DDD correctly emulated by any pure function HHH that
> correctly emulates 1 to ∞ lines of DDD can't make it
> to the second line of DDD no matter what.
> 
> DDD correctly emulated by any pure function HHH that
> correctly emulates 1 to ∞ lines of DDD can't make it
> to the second line of DDD no matter what.
> 
> DDD correctly emulated by any pure function HHH that
> correctly emulates 1 to ∞ lines of DDD can't make it
> to the second line of DDD no matter what.
> 
> DDD correctly emulated by any pure function HHH that
> correctly emulates 1 to ∞ lines of DDD can't make it
> to the second line of DDD no matter what.
> 
> DDD correctly emulated by any pure function HHH that
> correctly emulates 1 to ∞ lines of DDD can't make it
> to the second line of DDD no matter what.
> 
> DDD correctly emulated by any pure function HHH that
> correctly emulates 1 to ∞ lines of DDD can't make it
> to the second line of DDD no matter what.
> 
> DDD correctly emulated by any pure function HHH that
> correctly emulates 1 to ∞ lines of DDD can't make it
> to the second line of DDD no matter what.
> 
> DDD correctly emulated by any pure function HHH that
> correctly emulates 1 to ∞ lines of DDD can't make it
> to the second line of DDD no matter what.
> 
> DDD correctly emulated by any pure function HHH that
> correctly emulates 1 to ∞ lines of DDD can't make it
> to the second line of DDD no matter what.
> 
> DDD correctly emulated by any pure function HHH that
> correctly emulates 1 to ∞ lines of DDD can't make it
> to the second line of DDD no matter what.
> 
> DDD correctly emulated by any pure function HHH that
> correctly emulates 1 to ∞ lines of DDD can't make it
> to the second line of DDD no matter what.
> 
> DDD correctly emulated by any pure function HHH that
> correctly emulates 1 to ∞ lines of DDD can't make it
> to the second line of DDD no matter what.
> 
> DDD correctly emulated by any pure function HHH that
> correctly emulates 1 to ∞ lines of DDD can't make it
> to the second line of DDD no matter what.
> 
> DDD correctly emulated by any pure function HHH that
> correctly emulates 1 to ∞ lines of DDD can't make it
> to the second line of DDD no matter what.
> 
> DDD correctly emulated by any pure function HHH that
> correctly emulates 1 to ∞ lines of DDD can't make it
> to the second line of DDD no matter what.
> 
> DDD correctly emulated by any pure function HHH that
> correctly emulates 1 to ∞ lines of DDD can't make it
> to the second line of DDD no matter what.
> 
> DDD correctly emulated by any pure function HHH that
> correctly emulates 1 to ∞ lines of DDD can't make it
> to the second line of DDD no matter what.
> 
> DDD correctly emulated by any pure function HHH that
> correctly emulates 1 to ∞ lines of DDD can't make it
> to the second line of DDD no matter what.
> 
> DDD correctly emulated by any pure function HHH that
> correctly emulates 1 to ∞ lines of DDD can't make it
> to the second line of DDD no matter what.
> 
> DDD correctly emulated by any pure function HHH that
> correctly emulates 1 to ∞ lines of DDD can't make it
> to the second line of DDD no matter what.
> 
> DDD correctly emulated by any pure function HHH that
> correctly emulates 1 to ∞ lines of DDD can't make it
> to the second line of DDD no matter what.
> 
> DDD correctly emulated by any pure function HHH that
> correctly emulates 1 to ∞ lines of DDD can't make it
> to the second line of DDD no matter what.
> 
> DDD correctly emulated by any pure function HHH that
> correctly emulates 1 to ∞ lines of DDD can't make it
> to the second line of DDD no matter what.
> 
> DDD correctly emulated by any pure function HHH that
> correctly emulates 1 to ∞ lines of DDD can't make it
> to the second line of DDD no matter what.
> 
> DDD correctly emulated by any pure function HHH that
========== REMAINDER OF ARTICLE TRUNCATED ==========