| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<7jtanjhrrkraiq3h8dsvoi8triis8aep4l@4ax.com> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: shawn <nanoflower@notforg.m.a.i.l.com> Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv,alt.food.fast-food Subject: Re: The WORST Fast Food of 2024 Date: Wed, 01 Jan 2025 12:10:27 -0500 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 36 Message-ID: <7jtanjhrrkraiq3h8dsvoi8triis8aep4l@4ax.com> References: <GaydnQzerOBAX-n6nZ2dnZfqnPGdnZ2d@giganews.com> <905423619.757420801.879092.anim8rfsk-cox.net@news.easynews.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Wed, 01 Jan 2025 18:10:28 +0100 (CET) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="eb1dbbfa7cb06fce85bdd6dfff653a51"; logging-data="3018160"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/6vzNjKTcbeJ7T0h4OgBWRmmW1qKpPCr4=" User-Agent: ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272 Cancel-Lock: sha1:8AIJOldvzEp6OKKt9AvnfQVQwME= Bytes: 2115 On Wed, 1 Jan 2025 09:41:53 -0700, anim8rfsk <anim8rfsk@cox.net> wrote: >Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net> wrote: >> 2024 has been a year of many different fast food releases - today I'll >> be looking at the 5 Worst Fast Food Releases of 2024 based on my >> reviews this year! >> >> https://youtu.be/DUVeYQ-K1pc?si=VBv6-_C1IG4RvbaN >> > >If somebody wants to recap this, I’ll read it but there’s no way in hell. >I’m sitting through this freaks video. The guy is harmless enough and has become surprisingly popular over the years. You can turn on the transcript and just read that if you want. I would post the whole thing but I have to capture it a page at a time to post and no one has the time/patience for that. 0:00 well hello ladies gentlemen and everyone 0:03 watching welcome one and all to this 0:06 latest and newest video I'm your host 0:08 the report of the week thank you for 0:11 checking in so diverting from a direct 0:14 review hence the uh little bit different 0:17 introduction today this is I think going