| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<7p4aajpalabvaaubkt60igcud1pm6mp09c@4ax.com> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!feeds.phibee-telecom.net!2.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Paul S Person <psperson@old.netcom.invalid> Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.written,rec.arts.comics.strips Subject: Re: xkcd: CrowdStrike Date: Sat, 27 Jul 2024 08:36:31 -0700 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 62 Message-ID: <7p4aajpalabvaaubkt60igcud1pm6mp09c@4ax.com> References: <v7mhb5$qi0k$2@dont-email.me> <pan$efaa$e4f1e82d$63a65db8$edda2d85@cpacker.org> <q8mv9jpn95tb1urggdutodhiktta669ogv@4ax.com> <v81f3u$32eu9$3@dont-email.me> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Date: Sat, 27 Jul 2024 17:36:35 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="0efcc8863f317f1a6e1933ce0aff90cf"; logging-data="3628548"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18hgbxXEFHuS7cP22kQzoVsI5BW5q3bxe8=" User-Agent: ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272 Cancel-Lock: sha1:LpxLiUQ3jPidZl5YnFrRUGNebqc= Bytes: 3302 On Fri, 26 Jul 2024 19:30:54 -0500, Lynn McGuire <lynnmcguire5@gmail.com> wrote: >On 7/23/2024 11:27 AM, Paul S Person wrote: >> On Tue, 23 Jul 2024 07:56:32 -0000 (UTC), Charles Packer >> <mailbox@cpacker.org> wrote: >>=20 >>> On Mon, 22 Jul 2024 16:01:25 -0500, Lynn McGuire wrote: >>> >>>> xkcd: CrowdStrike >>>> https://www.xkcd.com/2961/ >>>> >>>> Make the best of bad times. >>>> >>>> Explained at: >>>> https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php/2961:_CrowdStrike >>>> >>>> Lynn >>> >>> Was anybody here affected by the CrowdStrike Thing? >>> My nephew's wife flew to Europe that day without incident. >>=20 >> Not here. But then, I don't do that much on the Web. And I use Windows >> 10's security, which was not affected. >>=20 >> I saw an article where Microsoft was blaming the EU for forcing them >> to allow 3rd-party access to the Kernal, which they claim is what >> enabled the update to do bad things. If that is true, they may have a >> point. > >=93Microsoft wants to make future CrowdStrike outages impossible, and it= =20 >could mean big changes for security software: >=20 >https://www.windowscentral.com/software-apps/windows-11/microsoft-wants-= to-make-future-crowdstrike-outages-impossible-and-it-could-mean-big-chang= es-for-security-software > >=93Microsoft appears to want to shift away from security software having= =20 >kernel access on Windows 11, though the company hasn=92t said that = outright.=94 > >Sounds like a good idea. And fix all of the other kernel holes while=20 >they are at it. But will the EU allow it? I suppose they could do two versions, one for the EU and the other for sane [1] areas.=20 The EU could enjoy a Windows subject to assault by poorly-programmed alternatives to Windows utilities/subsystems. The Rest of Us could keep on using our computers. Well, except when Microsoft blunders, of course. [1] For a meaning of "sane" restricted to "believes restricting access to the kernal is a good idea". --=20 "Here lies the Tuscan poet Aretino, Who evil spoke of everyone but God, Giving as his excuse, 'I never knew him.'"