Path: news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Catrike Ryder <Soloman@old.bikers.org>
Newsgroups: rec.bicycles.tech
Subject: Re: Riding a bike a protection and in general
Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2025 08:55:51 -0400
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 122
Message-ID: <7pd55k1r2h22h0r32h9qfp1hl6rcn0j25l@4ax.com>
References: <102pfb8$1mt6u$9@dont-email.me> <102pk6i$1ouco$2@dont-email.me> <hnn05k10bcun2dftnhbm910trvbrpnn8eb@4ax.com> <102pq6i$1qde4$2@dont-email.me> <102qjcr$2495c$3@dont-email.me> <ldb25ktnfran83ju1inrg2kd2pc27lbdio@4ax.com> <102rpfd$2d8o9$3@dont-email.me> <102s0tp$2etef$3@dont-email.me> <sd635kp6uor5mk95abmo3dfnu748hubrvb@4ax.com> <102snfe$2koi8$3@dont-email.me> <avo35ktb7c76o32ra5g9evsd5vmk0do5gh@4ax.com> <6m345kpmqthkqfijlv0ct9en9l4ehk1qti@4ax.com> <102ubgl$33mir$2@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2025 14:55:52 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="635ca648c006e3968e4861e4a7232d2a";
	logging-data="3297191"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19EbM7aCMdyHzASIeZk7RnudEaPRHs4dK0="
User-Agent: ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272
Cancel-Lock: sha1:6cnnEZrjQQD2N6eX7uYqzOrRI58=

On Wed, 18 Jun 2025 08:30:13 -0400, Zen Cycle <funkmaster@hotmail.com>
wrote:

>On 6/17/2025 9:08 PM, John B. wrote:
>> On Tue, 17 Jun 2025 18:12:57 -0400, Catrike Ryder
>> <Soloman@old.bikers.org> wrote:
>> 
>>> `On Tue, 17 Jun 2025 17:42:04 -0400, Frank Krygowski
>>> <frkrygow@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 6/17/2025 12:44 PM, Catrike Ryder wrote:
>>>>> On Tue, 17 Jun 2025 11:17:12 -0400, Frank Krygowski
>>>>> <frkrygow@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Unlike some here, I think it's nonsense to say that nothing is
>>>>>> quantifiable, that _everything_ is subjective. That attitude is just a
>>>>>> lazy thinker's way of pretending one's uninformed opinion is always right.
>>>>>
>>>>>> I don't buy that attitude - maybe in part because in my profession, I
>>>>>> was paid to (among many other things) correct other's mistakes. My
>>>>>> education taught me to pay attention to data, and I taught that to others.
>>>>>
>>>>> Sure you paid attention to the nonsense data that said that having a
>>>>> gun in your house made it more likely to get shot.
>>>>
>>>> <https://www.acpjournals.org/doi/full/10.7326/M21-3762>
>>>> "Overall rates of homicide were more than twice as high among
>>>> cohabitants of handgun owners than among cohabitants of nonowners
>>>> (adjusted hazard ratio, 2.33 [95% CI, 1.78 to 3.05]). These elevated
>>>> rates were driven largely by higher rates of homicide by firearm
>>>> (adjusted hazard ratio, 2.83 [CI, 2.05 to 3.91]). Among homicides
>>>> occurring at home, cohabitants of owners had sevenfold higher rates of
>>>> being fatally shot by a spouse or intimate partner (adjusted hazard
>>>> ratio, 7.16 [CI, 4.04 to 12.69]); 84% of these victims were female."
>>>>
>>>> <https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9715182/>
>>>> "For every time a gun in the home was used in a self-defense or legally
>>>> justifiable shooting, there were four unintentional shootings, seven
>>>> criminal assaults or homicides, and 11 attempted or completed suicides.
>>>>
>>>> "Conclusions: Guns kept in homes are more likely to be involved in a
>>>> fatal or nonfatal accidental shooting, criminal assault, or suicide
>>>> attempt than to be used to injure or kill in self-defense."
>>>
>>> <CHUCKLE> Krygowski lacks the intellectual ability to see that his
>>> cite doesn't even address his claim that guns in the home make it more
>>> likely you'd be shot.
>
><SNICKER>
>Floriduh dumbass is too deluded and lacking in intellectual ability to 
>comprehend:
>"Conclusions: Guns kept in homes are more likely to be involved in a 
>fatal or nonfatal accidental shooting, criminal assault, or suicide 
>attempt than to be used to injure or kill in self-defense."
>
>let me help you out, dumbass, the cite _directly_ addresses his claim 
>that guns in the home make it more likely you'd be shot, and explicitly 
>states such. Only a floriduh dumbass could read "Guns kept in homes are 
>more likely to be involved in a fatal or nonfatal accidental shooting" 
>and "Overall rates of homicide were more than twice as high among 
>cohabitants of handgun owners than among cohabitants of nonowners"
>and conclude "doesn't even address his claim that guns in the home make 
>it more likely you'd be shot."
>
>This is right up there with you seeing two government reports stating 
>the military specified the design of the AR-15, tested it, bought 80,000 
>of then, and designated them as standard issue, then stating "the AR-15 
>was a weapon the military never wanted and never used"
>
>It's an embarrassment to know I have any interaction with such a deluded 
>and willfully ignorant asshole like you.
>
>>>
>>> The study looked at 626 shootings in several cities. There's no
>>> mention of how and why they picked those cities. They could have been
>>> cherry picked because the results fit their agenda.
>
>"could have"...talk about cherry picking...lol
>
>>>
>>> Dimbulb Krygowski doesn't question the data because it fits his
>>> agenda, so he just repeats what the people (who are they, and what's
>>> their agenda) who ran the study tell him.
>
>at least he has data, rather than a dumbass who sticks his fingers in 
>his ears and chants "fox news" repeatedly when he hears something he 
>doesn't like
>
>>>
>>>>> Krygowski is totally obsessed with me.
>>>>
>>>> :-)  HA! _That_ got an outright laugh!
>>>
>>>
>>> ...and Krygowski demonstrates agaon, that he is totally obsessed with
>>> me. I'll bet he lies awake night thinking what he can say to get back
>>> at me for pointing out what a wussy he is.
>
>lol....dumbass once again demonstrates what an ignorant narcissistic 
>fucktard he is.
>
>> 
>> When he first posted that study I had a look at then numbers and yes,
>> IF there is a gun in the house AND a homicide is committed in the
>> house it will likely be committed with a gun. Which seems logical.
>> 
>> But this has NO relationship to his unspoken conclusion that a gun in
>> the house results in homicides.
>
>hey, stupid....it isn't unspoken, it's explicitly stated there there's a 
>direct relationship between a gun in the home and an increase in 
>homicide. Are you taking kunich lessons in dumbassery again?


I'm pretty sure that there many far owners of guns who have not been
shot than those who have. According to Junior's and Krygowski's
"logic" that would indicate that owning a gun makes you less likely to
be shot.

--
C'est bon
Soloman