Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<7s21lj97iqapkoeo9v75fb3kakp0u8ea2l@4ax.com> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy Subject: Re: A GNU/Linux Machine Takes Shape Date: Wed, 04 Dec 2024 12:30:38 -0500 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 33 Message-ID: <7s21lj97iqapkoeo9v75fb3kakp0u8ea2l@4ax.com> References: <pan$92e1e$342ece1d$5c1e3f2d$94b93963@linux.rocks> <vio4mk$ds39$1@dont-email.me> <lrbbivFej5hU1@mid.individual.net> <viq0o4$vrhp$1@dont-email.me> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Wed, 04 Dec 2024 18:30:39 +0100 (CET) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="51f2112e97b0c6fd590c18b24c889e38"; logging-data="1071432"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX198+xAnRnRGWBbUpbiAxeLXuAIzG8hPS9k=" User-Agent: ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272 Cancel-Lock: sha1:+bliEbR0elrxmvHv7o0to25g06o= OS: Debian 12, with Wine 9.0 for WinAPI Bytes: 2091 DFS <guhnoo-basher@linux.advocaca> wrote: >On 12/4/2024 10:42 AM, vallor wrote: >> > > [Larry is] going on about an 8-core processor. (SMDH) > > $ grep processor /proc/cpuinfo | wc -l >> 64 >> (32 HT cores) >> >> Anybody else? > >Remember that Feeb does more in one day with 8 cores than you do in a >year with 64. Or so that's the claim from the geek in Mom's basement. Larry appears to engage some advanced stuff, but at the cost of having a system that in any way resembles a "PC", it's just a tinkering setup. -- Joel W. Crump Amendment XIV Section 1. [...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws. Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.