Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<7s21lj97iqapkoeo9v75fb3kakp0u8ea2l@4ax.com>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy
Subject: Re: A GNU/Linux Machine Takes Shape
Date: Wed, 04 Dec 2024 12:30:38 -0500
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 33
Message-ID: <7s21lj97iqapkoeo9v75fb3kakp0u8ea2l@4ax.com>
References: <pan$92e1e$342ece1d$5c1e3f2d$94b93963@linux.rocks> <vio4mk$ds39$1@dont-email.me> <lrbbivFej5hU1@mid.individual.net> <viq0o4$vrhp$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Wed, 04 Dec 2024 18:30:39 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="51f2112e97b0c6fd590c18b24c889e38";
	logging-data="1071432"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX198+xAnRnRGWBbUpbiAxeLXuAIzG8hPS9k="
User-Agent: ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272
Cancel-Lock: sha1:+bliEbR0elrxmvHv7o0to25g06o=
OS: Debian 12, with Wine 9.0 for WinAPI
Bytes: 2091

DFS <guhnoo-basher@linux.advocaca> wrote:
>On 12/4/2024 10:42 AM, vallor wrote:
>> 
> > [Larry is] going on about an 8-core processor.  (SMDH)
>  > $ grep processor /proc/cpuinfo | wc -l
>> 64
>> (32 HT cores)
>> 
>> Anybody else?
>
>Remember that Feeb does more in one day with 8 cores than you do in a 
>year with 64.  Or so that's the claim from the geek in Mom's basement.


Larry appears to engage some advanced stuff, but at the cost of having
a system that in any way resembles a "PC", it's just a tinkering
setup.

-- 
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent.  States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.