Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<7ujhlj5c43v40ftm9ov19lni29omdmaji5@4ax.com>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!news.quux.org!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Mad Hamish <newsunspammelaws@iinet.unspamme.net.au>
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.written
Subject: Re: OT: The Robots are coming.
Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2024 10:39:15 +1100
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 48
Message-ID: <7ujhlj5c43v40ftm9ov19lni29omdmaji5@4ax.com>
References: <vj7gvh$hts1$1@dont-email.me> <3s8fljlp3v78jqqchobnjlq6q0fn1iknng@4ax.com> <vja3va$13b2c$2@dont-email.me>
Reply-To: newsunspammelaws@iinet.unspamme.net.au
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2024 00:39:49 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="f0f9fae5bf28dad301c91af3f88127d3";
	logging-data="1262547"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18YfEwHInJOD3MluhlJCnsU"
User-Agent: ForteAgent/7.20.32.1218
Cancel-Lock: sha1:C8SiMMEnDskrnjeZAPqHdfGSEqw=
Bytes: 3097

On Tue, 10 Dec 2024 14:14:50 -0500, Cryptoengineer
<petertrei@gmail.com> wrote:

>On 12/9/2024 9:13 PM, Mad Hamish wrote:
>> On Mon, 9 Dec 2024 14:38:24 -0500, Cryptoengineer
>> <petertrei@gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>>> I know for many it's politically correct to crap on anything Elon Musk
>>> is involved in these days, but its worth keeping up with his companies
>>> accomplishments.
>>>
>>> Here's his robot, walking over uneven terrain, up and downhill, and
>>> recovering from slips:
>> 
>> I worked for a guy 20 years ago who'd previously worked in robotics in
>> the USA
>> Companies had worked out walking robots when he was there.
>
>Link?
>
No link this was in a conversation with him at work

>1. Did it operate from on board power, or was it cabled?
>2. Did it use on-board computers, or was that also cabled?
>3. Could it walk over rough, unstable surfaces, as this one does?
>
>The earliest bipedal robot I can find is actually Chinese, from 2000,
>called Xianxingzhe:
>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TTBxHOM-NmM

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ASIMO#:~:text=E0%20was%20the%20first%20bipedal,produced%20from%201993%20through%201997.
has some earlier ones, and there's a medium link
https://antoniamalchik.medium.com/the-bumpy-road-to-a-walking-robot-c3d5e25e716c#:~:text=In%201969%20a%20team%20at,manage%20stairs%20and%20small%20inclines.
that puts it further back 
"In 1969 a team at Waseda University in Japan built the first
computer-controlled bipedal robot. It took an achingly slow ninety
seconds to complete each step on a completely flat surface. Only in
1971 did that same team build a version that could manage stairs and
small inclines"
>
>It doesn't meet any of the 3 above conditions, though it can handle
>stepping over an obstacle.
>
>The new ones can do all these things. They are a hell of a
>lot closer to Asimovian robots than anything that came before.
>Tesla has done in 3 years what took Boston Dynamics 20.
>
>pt