| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<7ujhlj5c43v40ftm9ov19lni29omdmaji5@4ax.com> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!news.quux.org!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Mad Hamish <newsunspammelaws@iinet.unspamme.net.au> Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.written Subject: Re: OT: The Robots are coming. Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2024 10:39:15 +1100 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 48 Message-ID: <7ujhlj5c43v40ftm9ov19lni29omdmaji5@4ax.com> References: <vj7gvh$hts1$1@dont-email.me> <3s8fljlp3v78jqqchobnjlq6q0fn1iknng@4ax.com> <vja3va$13b2c$2@dont-email.me> Reply-To: newsunspammelaws@iinet.unspamme.net.au MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2024 00:39:49 +0100 (CET) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="f0f9fae5bf28dad301c91af3f88127d3"; logging-data="1262547"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18YfEwHInJOD3MluhlJCnsU" User-Agent: ForteAgent/7.20.32.1218 Cancel-Lock: sha1:C8SiMMEnDskrnjeZAPqHdfGSEqw= Bytes: 3097 On Tue, 10 Dec 2024 14:14:50 -0500, Cryptoengineer <petertrei@gmail.com> wrote: >On 12/9/2024 9:13 PM, Mad Hamish wrote: >> On Mon, 9 Dec 2024 14:38:24 -0500, Cryptoengineer >> <petertrei@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> I know for many it's politically correct to crap on anything Elon Musk >>> is involved in these days, but its worth keeping up with his companies >>> accomplishments. >>> >>> Here's his robot, walking over uneven terrain, up and downhill, and >>> recovering from slips: >> >> I worked for a guy 20 years ago who'd previously worked in robotics in >> the USA >> Companies had worked out walking robots when he was there. > >Link? > No link this was in a conversation with him at work >1. Did it operate from on board power, or was it cabled? >2. Did it use on-board computers, or was that also cabled? >3. Could it walk over rough, unstable surfaces, as this one does? > >The earliest bipedal robot I can find is actually Chinese, from 2000, >called Xianxingzhe: >https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TTBxHOM-NmM https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ASIMO#:~:text=E0%20was%20the%20first%20bipedal,produced%20from%201993%20through%201997. has some earlier ones, and there's a medium link https://antoniamalchik.medium.com/the-bumpy-road-to-a-walking-robot-c3d5e25e716c#:~:text=In%201969%20a%20team%20at,manage%20stairs%20and%20small%20inclines. that puts it further back "In 1969 a team at Waseda University in Japan built the first computer-controlled bipedal robot. It took an achingly slow ninety seconds to complete each step on a completely flat surface. Only in 1971 did that same team build a version that could manage stairs and small inclines" > >It doesn't meet any of the 3 above conditions, though it can handle >stepping over an obstacle. > >The new ones can do all these things. They are a hell of a >lot closer to Asimovian robots than anything that came before. >Tesla has done in 3 years what took Boston Dynamics 20. > >pt