Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<80b3960b787aa34a45cd28adf697606f@www.novabbs.com> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!i2pn.org!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: hitlong@yahoo.com (gharnagel) Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity Subject: Re: Sync two clocks Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2024 02:26:00 +0000 Organization: novaBBS Message-ID: <80b3960b787aa34a45cd28adf697606f@www.novabbs.com> References: <u18wy1Hl3tOo1DpOF6WVSF0s-08@jntp> <v9nant$1d2us$1@dont-email.me> <vPP1Z1BJfE1Dt7SYhCzEo7ZQWFI@jntp> <va0a4f$30p95$1@dont-email.me> <Zwwc8OsxqpAwTzvPkie6NmgxmY8@jntp> <ad1be0767d67933777b11e63154fbbaa@www.novabbs.com> <9hlOUodP8C-awRfUyYwo5eBs1Ec@jntp> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: i2pn2.org; logging-data="3182339"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org"; posting-account="p+/k+WRPC4XqxRx3JUZcWF5fRnK/u/hzv6aL21GRPZM"; User-Agent: Rocksolid Light X-Rslight-Site: $2y$10$ivaK8705ENdQK5XBl0poZev0WTNQg.KdDKWur.2syLY.6.rtIE8Mq X-Rslight-Posting-User: 47dad9ee83da8658a9a980eb24d2d25075d9b155 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0 Bytes: 2609 Lines: 43 On Tue, 20 Aug 2024 0:35:42 +0000, Richard Hachel wrote: > > Le 20/08/2024 à 01:33, hitlong@yahoo.com (gharnagel) a écrit : > > > > If tAB = tBA, then Paul's procedure works. If tAB <> tBA, > > then your point M method won't work either. > > If we synchronize on an abstract point M placed at an equal > distance from A, B, C, D, E, we obtain for E a plane of the > present time where A, B,C,D and E are simultaneously located. Richard, Richard, Richard! If tAB <> tBA, your method won't work Breath, blow, and THINK! Given A ___________ M ___________ B If tAB <> tBA, then tAM <> tMB and A and B won't be synchronized. If, OTOH tMA = tMB, then tAB = tBA. > .... > The universal present does not exist!!! I see no justification for your insistence on this canard. Your protestation that the GPS isn't "real" synchronization has no factual basis. “If it’s stupid but it works, it isn’t stupid.” -- Naval Ops Manual > I repeat again, even if it must be said with knees in the testicles, > and big slaps in the snout. Owww! > "Your stupid present tense doesn't exist." I will never understand > this blockage for a concept that I thought was understandable for > an eleven-year-old child, and which seems to block everyone. > > R.H. Even a child knows that the present tense can exist elsewhere. Even Wozniak and the GPS agree that "t' = t." It's not stupid, but even if it were stupid but it works, it's not stupid. It's real.