| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<828449197c1a677b8addcf873e0753ea@www.novabbs.com> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!i2pn.org!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: hitlong@yahoo.com (gharnagel) Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity Subject: Re: What is "local =?UTF-8?B?dGltZSI/?= Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2024 19:43:59 +0000 Organization: novaBBS Message-ID: <828449197c1a677b8addcf873e0753ea@www.novabbs.com> References: <M0ZS0z9of5m3zPojotZe3TGunn4@jntp> <1aec54a219198abeee623f4762a3f105@www.novabbs.com> <17fead611f0d4f22$260472$844270$c2365abb@news.newsdemon.com> <GCRBkG15sYAgJq8IFpUGyd-0A1o@jntp> <17febd840835ea5f$313547$853305$c2065a8b@news.newsdemon.com> <2efd75a85dc80d75d54ecfe4d61baf34@www.novabbs.com> <17fef24802f71607$317544$826957$c2265aab@news.newsdemon.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: i2pn2.org; logging-data="2338374"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org"; posting-account="TRF929uvrTGZYJLF+N3tVBXNVfr/PeoSjsJ9hd5hWzo"; User-Agent: Rocksolid Light X-Rslight-Posting-User: cefb4c33981645a229d345bae7bb8942e6b32c35 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0 X-Rslight-Site: $2y$10$Fdpu.ePJkyjks9n1aXQROujvjiW8DJCBuGLBjSAIwJTlmxYUg1746 Bytes: 3493 Lines: 81 On Wed, 16 Oct 2024 13:34:57 +0000, Maciej Wozniak wrote: > > W dniu 16.10.2024 o 05:45, gharnagel pisze: > > > > As usual, Wozniak is conflating two different > > concepts. > > As usual, Harrie spits. Says the congenital liar :-)) > And say nonsense about things he admits he > doesn't know much about. which Wozniak knows nothing about, which is why he keeps conflating two different things. > Well, it's not usual that he admits. I don't know much, but I'm always observing. Wozniak's problem is his false belief that he knows more while only being a poor observer. > > Humans try to model nature, and since, for > > example, trees grow, die and decay, there > > is something in nature that changes. > > Oh, there is a wide variety of things > that change in nature. Time, however, > is not any of them. There is no time > in nature. Wozniak is likely to get hit by a falling rock; that is, one that is changing its position in space as a function of time passing. > It's a purely virtual abstract invented > by humans - for the purpose of describing. > Describing nature and other things. That's only ONE definition. Wozniak is a poor observer because he refuses to see the other one. This one: "Time is what keeps everything from happening at once" -- Ray Cummings This is the one as real as a punch in the face. The punch may come from a person (who is also a part of nature), or it may come from a falling rock. > Time is almost always present in any > description of anything. That's why > it appears for weak minds to be something > real. Wozniak has a weak mind because he can't understand that there are two kinds of "time": the real one in nature and our attempts to describe it (with clocks and coordinates). > > Clocks and coordinates and theories are ways > > that we model time. But they aren't time, > > Clocks are clocks, theories are theories. > Time is obviously not any of them. Agreed. Time is a part of nature; it's neither clocks nor theories. > As for coordinates - we have created a > number of them, and about 20-30 of them > are times. Of course, DUH! > > just as the map is not the territory. Just as a clock is not time.