Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<828449197c1a677b8addcf873e0753ea@www.novabbs.com>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!i2pn.org!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: hitlong@yahoo.com (gharnagel)
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Subject: Re: What is "local =?UTF-8?B?dGltZSI/?=
Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2024 19:43:59 +0000
Organization: novaBBS
Message-ID: <828449197c1a677b8addcf873e0753ea@www.novabbs.com>
References: <M0ZS0z9of5m3zPojotZe3TGunn4@jntp> <1aec54a219198abeee623f4762a3f105@www.novabbs.com> <17fead611f0d4f22$260472$844270$c2365abb@news.newsdemon.com> <GCRBkG15sYAgJq8IFpUGyd-0A1o@jntp> <17febd840835ea5f$313547$853305$c2065a8b@news.newsdemon.com> <2efd75a85dc80d75d54ecfe4d61baf34@www.novabbs.com> <17fef24802f71607$317544$826957$c2265aab@news.newsdemon.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Info: i2pn2.org;
	logging-data="2338374"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org";
	posting-account="TRF929uvrTGZYJLF+N3tVBXNVfr/PeoSjsJ9hd5hWzo";
User-Agent: Rocksolid Light
X-Rslight-Posting-User: cefb4c33981645a229d345bae7bb8942e6b32c35
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0
X-Rslight-Site: $2y$10$Fdpu.ePJkyjks9n1aXQROujvjiW8DJCBuGLBjSAIwJTlmxYUg1746
Bytes: 3493
Lines: 81

On Wed, 16 Oct 2024 13:34:57 +0000, Maciej Wozniak wrote:
>
> W dniu 16.10.2024 o 05:45, gharnagel pisze:
> >
> > As usual, Wozniak is conflating two different
> > concepts.
>
> As usual, Harrie spits.

Says the congenital liar :-))

> And say nonsense about things he admits he
> doesn't know much about.

which Wozniak knows nothing about, which is why
he keeps conflating two different things.

> Well, it's not usual that he admits.

I don't know much, but I'm always observing.
Wozniak's problem is his false belief that he
knows more while only being a poor observer.

> > Humans try to model nature, and since, for
> > example, trees grow, die and decay, there
> > is something in nature that changes.
>
> Oh, there is a wide variety of things
> that change in nature. Time, however,
> is not any of them. There is no time
> in nature.

Wozniak is likely to get hit by a falling
rock; that is, one that is changing its
position in space as a function of time
passing.

> It's a purely virtual abstract invented
> by humans - for the purpose of describing.
> Describing nature and other things.

That's only ONE definition.  Wozniak is a
poor observer because he refuses to see the
other one.  This one:

"Time is what keeps everything from happening at
once" -- Ray Cummings

This is the one as real as a punch in the face.
The punch may come from a person (who is also a
part of nature), or it may come from a falling
rock.

> Time is almost always present in  any
> description of anything.  That's why
> it appears for weak minds to be something
> real.

Wozniak has a weak mind because he can't
understand that there are two kinds of
"time": the real one in nature and our
attempts to describe it (with clocks and
coordinates).

> > Clocks and coordinates and theories are ways
> > that we model time.  But they aren't time,
>
> Clocks are clocks, theories are theories.
> Time is obviously not any of them.

Agreed.  Time is a part of nature; it's neither
clocks nor theories.

> As for coordinates - we have created a
> number of them, and about 20-30 of them
> are times.

Of course, DUH!

> > just as the map is not the territory.

Just as a clock is not time.