Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!i2pn.org!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: joes <noreply@example.org>
Newsgroups: comp.theory
Subject: Re: DDD specifies recursive emulation to HHH and halting to HHH1 ---
 STA
Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2025 14:06:48 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: i2pn2 (i2pn.org)
Message-ID: <829df7c882a73597e03bfaf34aa7883cbb74acd3@i2pn2.org>
References: <vrfuob$256og$1@dont-email.me> <vs93ae$1k9u2$1@dont-email.me>
	<vs9g5p$1v2n9$5@dont-email.me> <vs9gcg$20g2j$3@dont-email.me>
	<vs9h9o$23cav$2@dont-email.me> <vs9hh3$20g2j$6@dont-email.me>
	<vs9jie$23cav$4@dont-email.me> <vs9kb1$26cg5$2@dont-email.me>
	<vs9pni$27rl4$9@dont-email.me> <vs9r1b$28tqg$2@dont-email.me>
	<vs9t45$2f6n5$1@dont-email.me>
	<9f2ff3ab9b99a7bb6dfa0885f9757f810ce52e66@i2pn2.org>
	<vsaam4$2sfhq$1@dont-email.me> <vsbi7e$1hblk$1@dont-email.me>
	<vsc6qi$27lbo$2@dont-email.me>
	<8a3e7e93e6cad20b29d23405a0e6dbd497a492ac@i2pn2.org>
	<vscegq$2fv3s$2@dont-email.me>
	<26f33bb039fda7d28ae164cfc4d0f582d4698f31@i2pn2.org>
	<vsclsb$2n4jc$1@dont-email.me>
	<36a4c76730b23cf78ddde73c723116b5380973a1@i2pn2.org>
	<vsctnm$2ub5m$2@dont-email.me>
	<4285ea3219a2d5f2d6c52e84697fa4e3d3dc80cb@i2pn2.org>
	<vsd18m$379dn$1@dont-email.me> <vsdjff$3o5ff$1@dont-email.me>
	<vsem50$th5g$3@dont-email.me>
	<77c20f5832db4b47f5226dcb39bd2be7ba107a0c@i2pn2.org>
	<vsf8tv$1i673$2@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2025 14:06:48 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: i2pn2.org;
	logging-data="2818780"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org";
	posting-account="nS1KMHaUuWOnF/ukOJzx6Ssd8y16q9UPs1GZ+I3D0CM";
User-Agent: Pan/0.145 (Duplicitous mercenary valetism; d7e168a
 git.gnome.org/pan2)
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0
Bytes: 2501
Lines: 14

Am Mon, 31 Mar 2025 18:36:30 -0500 schrieb olcott:
> On 3/31/2025 5:32 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
>> On 3/31/25 2:16 PM, olcott wrote:
>>> A simulating termination analyzer is always correct to abort the
>>> simulation and reject the input as non-halting when-so-ever this input
>>> would otherwise prevent itself from halting.
>>>
>> But the input WILL halt, when it is correctly emulated.
>> 
> Where "correct" is defined to disagree with the x86 language.
How is DDD incorrectly simulated to halt?

-- 
Am Sat, 20 Jul 2024 12:35:31 +0000 schrieb WM in sci.math:
It is not guaranteed that n+1 exists for every n.