Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<838d9e68a4e7b87efa855079356090cb@www.novabbs.com> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!i2pn.org!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (bertietaylor) Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity,sci.physics Subject: Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2024 21:22:44 +0000 Organization: novaBBS Message-ID: <838d9e68a4e7b87efa855079356090cb@www.novabbs.com> References: <f429e76238b2d398d867e0ef814062c9@www.novabbs.com> <bb48bec2828275ded1eff95d17d3086c@www.novabbs.com> <2g9gsk-8ut3.ln1@gonzo.specsol.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: i2pn2.org; logging-data="3628430"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org"; posting-account="jh4HcpQ+hhhSYfMNELHwaYsVz4DxLTJw0pxiKoD05d4"; User-Agent: Rocksolid Light X-Rslight-Posting-User: cdf973c28ddff5d1d1235bf54e7ff9676b462801 X-Rslight-Site: $2y$10$MsXCvnXxnZ..eCwtfoOALeFAIE61aA.GjN0QfrHnIwc4mmsLzGpK6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0 Bytes: 1781 Lines: 21 On Thu, 26 Sep 2024 14:59:48 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote: > In sci.physics bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote: >> On Tue, 17 Sep 2024 11:19:24 +0000, bertietaylor wrote: >> >>> https://www.facebook.com/100000534193755/videos/350814810783223 >>> >>> All relevant links and details in >>> >>> https://www.novabbs.com/tech/article-flat.php?id=12218&group=sci.physics#12218 >>> >>> Woof-woof >>> >>> Bertietaylor (Arindam Banerjee's celestial cyberdogs) >> >> So the question is, can anyone show from the above experiment that >> inertia is NOT violated? > > Yes, and you have been shown so. Good. When inertia is violated the whole of physics gets revised. The world becomes much saner and richer.